From: =?gb18030?B?bWFubnl3YW5nKM3108C35Sk=?= <mannywang@tencent.com>
To: fengchengwen <fengchengwen@huawei.com>,
Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Internet]Re: [PATCH v5] acl: support custom memory allocators in rte_acl_build
Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 17:31:28 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1DF1D898A5174549+02f62241-5859-4ba3-9edb-d2c086ec497d@tencent.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <58cca566-08bd-469e-b244-1800e0456cb0@huawei.com>
Thanks for the review and comments.
Regarding the placement of mem_hook (or mem_cb):
I didn’t adopt the suggestion to move this field after num_categories,
because the memory region after num_categories is cleared during
rte_acl_reset().
To preserve the callback data across resets, the field must be located
before num_categories.
All the other comments have been addressed in this version.
On 12/2/2025 10:47 AM, fengchengwen wrote:
> commit header could simply as: acl: support custom memory allocator
>
> On 12/1/2025 8:45 PM, mannywang(王永峰) wrote:
>> Allow users to provide custom
>> memory allocation callbacks for runtime memory in rte_acl_ctx, via
>> struct rte_acl_mem_cb.
>>
>> Key changes:
>> - Added struct rte_acl_mem_cb with zalloc, free, and udata.
>> - Added rte_acl_set_mem_cb() / rte_acl_get_mem_cb() to set/get callbacks.
>> - Default allocation uses existing rte_zmalloc_socket/rte_free.
>> - Modified ACL code to call callbacks for runtime allocations instead
>> of rte_zmalloc_socket/rte_free directly.
>>
>> v5:
>> - Remove temporary memory allocation callback for build stage.
>> - Introduce new API (rte_acl_set_mem_cb / rte_acl_get_mem_cb) instead of
>> modifying existing rte_acl_config to preserve ABI compatibility.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: YongFeng Wang <mannywang@tencent.com>
>> ---
>> app/test/test_acl.c | 121 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> lib/acl/acl.h | 1 +
>> lib/acl/acl_bld.c | 2 +-
>> lib/acl/acl_gen.c | 4 +-
>> lib/acl/rte_acl.c | 45 +++++++++++++++-
>> lib/acl/rte_acl.h | 42 +++++++++++++++
>> 6 files changed, 211 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/app/test/test_acl.c b/app/test/test_acl.c
>> index 43d13b5b0f..930fdf8362 100644
>> --- a/app/test/test_acl.c
>> +++ b/app/test/test_acl.c
>> @@ -1721,6 +1721,125 @@ test_u32_range(void)
>> return rc;
>> }
>>
>> +struct acl_ctx_wrapper_t {
>
> no need add post-fix _t
>
>> + struct rte_acl_ctx *ctx;
>> + void *running_buf;
>> + bool running_buf_using;
>> +};
>> +
>> +#define ACL_RUNNING_BUF_SIZE (10 * 1024 * 1024)
>> +
>> +static void *running_alloc(void *udata, char *name, size_t size,
>> + size_t align, int32_t socket_id)
>> +{
>> + (void)align;
>> + (void)name;
>> + (void)socket_id;
>> + if (size > ACL_RUNNING_BUF_SIZE)
>> + return NULL;
>> + struct acl_ctx_wrapper_t *gwlb_acl_ctx = (struct acl_ctx_wrapper_t *)udata;
>
> gwlb - what the meaning? suggest simple acl_ctx or just ctx.
>
>> + if (gwlb_acl_ctx->running_buf_using)
>> + return NULL;
>> + printf("running memory alloc for acl context, size=%zu, pointer=%p\n",
>> + size,
>> + gwlb_acl_ctx->running_buf);
>> + memset(gwlb_acl_ctx->running_buf, 0, size);
>> + gwlb_acl_ctx->running_buf_using = true;
>
> this allocator don't support conti alloc, it will has dependent for acl-library,
> how about use Dmitry Kozlyuk's comment for [PATCH v3], that is use rte_malloc_heap_create
>
>> + return gwlb_acl_ctx->running_buf;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void running_free(void *udata, void *ptr)
>> +{
>> + if (!ptr)
>> + return;
>> + struct acl_ctx_wrapper_t *gwlb_acl_ctx = (struct acl_ctx_wrapper_t *)udata;
>> + printf("running memory free, pointer=%p\n", ptr);
>> + gwlb_acl_ctx->running_buf_using = false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int
>> +test_mem_cb(void)
>> +{
>> + int i, ret;
>> + struct acl_ctx_wrapper_t g_acl_ctx_wrapper;
>
> no need add g_acl_ prefix, and suggest zero default (struct acl_ctx_wrapper ctx_wrap = {0})
>
>> + g_acl_ctx_wrapper.ctx = rte_acl_create(&acl_param);
>> + if (g_acl_ctx_wrapper.ctx == NULL) {
>> + printf("Line %i: Error creating ACL context!\n", __LINE__);
>> + return -1;
>> + }
>> + g_acl_ctx_wrapper.running_buf = rte_zmalloc_socket(
>> + "test_acl",
>> + ACL_RUNNING_BUF_SIZE,
>> + RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE,
>> + SOCKET_ID_ANY);
>> + if (!g_acl_ctx_wrapper.running_buf) {
>> + printf("Line %i: Error allocing running buf for acl context!\n", __LINE__);
>
> please add resource rollback, the same as following.
>
>> + return 1;
>> + }
>> + g_acl_ctx_wrapper.running_buf_using = false;
>> +
>> + struct rte_acl_mem_cb mcb = {
>> + .zalloc = running_alloc,
>> + .free = running_free,
>> + .udata = &g_acl_ctx_wrapper
>> + };
>> + ret = rte_acl_set_mem_cb(g_acl_ctx_wrapper.ctx, &mcb);
>> + if (ret) {
>
> please use explicit exp, e.g. if (ret != 0), the same as other place.
>
>> + printf("Line %i: Error set mem cb for acl context!\n", __LINE__);
>> + return 1;
>> + }
>> + struct rte_acl_mem_cb new_mcb;
>> + memset(&new_mcb, 0, sizeof(struct rte_acl_mem_cb));
>> + ret = rte_acl_get_mem_cb(g_acl_ctx_wrapper.ctx, &new_mcb);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + printf("Line %i: Error get mem cb for acl context!\n", __LINE__);
>> + return 1;
>> + }
>> + if (memcmp(&mcb, &new_mcb, sizeof(struct rte_acl_mem_cb)) != 0) {
>> + printf("Line %i: Error get mem cb for acl context!\n", __LINE__);
>> + return 1;
>> + }
>> + ret = 0;
>> + for (i = 0; i != TEST_CLASSIFY_ITER; i++) {
>
> why not i < TEST_CLASSIFY_ITER ?
>
>> +
>> + if ((i & 1) == 0)
>> + rte_acl_reset(g_acl_ctx_wrapper.ctx);
>> + else
>> + rte_acl_reset_rules(g_acl_ctx_wrapper.ctx);
>> +
>> + ret = test_classify_buid(g_acl_ctx_wrapper.ctx, acl_test_rules,
>> + RTE_DIM(acl_test_rules));
>> + if (ret != 0) {
>> + printf("Line %i, iter: %d: "
>> + "Adding rules to ACL context failed!\n",
>
> no need extra line for log-string.
>
>> + __LINE__, i);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = test_classify_run(g_acl_ctx_wrapper.ctx, acl_test_data,
>> + RTE_DIM(acl_test_data));
>> + if (ret != 0) {
>> + printf("Line %i, iter: %d: %s failed!\n",
>> + __LINE__, i, __func__);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* reset rules and make sure that classify still works ok. */
>> + rte_acl_reset_rules(g_acl_ctx_wrapper.ctx);
>> + ret = test_classify_run(g_acl_ctx_wrapper.ctx, acl_test_data,
>> + RTE_DIM(acl_test_data));
>> + if (ret != 0) {
>> + printf("Line %i, iter: %d: %s failed!\n",
>> + __LINE__, i, __func__);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + rte_acl_free(g_acl_ctx_wrapper.ctx);
>> + rte_free(g_acl_ctx_wrapper.running_buf);
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> static int
>> test_acl(void)
>> {
>> @@ -1742,6 +1861,8 @@ test_acl(void)
>> return -1;
>> if (test_u32_range() < 0)
>> return -1;
>> + if (test_mem_cb() < 0)
>> + return -1;
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> diff --git a/lib/acl/acl.h b/lib/acl/acl.h
>> index c8e4e72fab..3acfc0cb9f 100644
>> --- a/lib/acl/acl.h
>> +++ b/lib/acl/acl.h
>> @@ -174,6 +174,7 @@ struct rte_acl_ctx {
>> uint32_t max_rules;
>> uint32_t rule_sz;
>> uint32_t num_rules;
>> + struct rte_acl_mem_cb mem_cb;
>
> why not place near *mem/mem_sz field ?
>
>> uint32_t num_categories;
>> uint32_t num_tries;
>> uint32_t match_index;
>> diff --git a/lib/acl/acl_bld.c b/lib/acl/acl_bld.c
>> index 7056b1c117..e3d342bd79 100644
>> --- a/lib/acl/acl_bld.c
>> +++ b/lib/acl/acl_bld.c
>> @@ -779,7 +779,7 @@ acl_merge_trie(struct acl_build_context *context,
>> static void
>> acl_build_reset(struct rte_acl_ctx *ctx)
>> {
>> - rte_free(ctx->mem);
>> + ctx->mem_cb.free(ctx->mem_cb.udata, ctx->mem);
>> memset(&ctx->num_categories, 0,
>> sizeof(*ctx) - offsetof(struct rte_acl_ctx, num_categories));
>> }
>> diff --git a/lib/acl/acl_gen.c b/lib/acl/acl_gen.c
>> index 3c53d24056..f482317884 100644
>> --- a/lib/acl/acl_gen.c
>> +++ b/lib/acl/acl_gen.c
>> @@ -478,8 +478,8 @@ rte_acl_gen(struct rte_acl_ctx *ctx, struct rte_acl_trie *trie,
>> return -ERANGE;
>> }
>>
>> - mem = rte_zmalloc_socket(ctx->name, total_size, RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE,
>> - ctx->socket_id);
>> + mem = ctx->mem_cb.zalloc(ctx->mem_cb.udata, ctx->name, total_size,
>> + RTE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE, ctx->socket_id);
>> if (mem == NULL) {
>> ACL_LOG(ERR,
>> "allocation of %zu bytes on socket %d for %s failed",
>> diff --git a/lib/acl/rte_acl.c b/lib/acl/rte_acl.c
>> index 8c0ca29618..3c1a118c46 100644
>> --- a/lib/acl/rte_acl.c
>> +++ b/lib/acl/rte_acl.c
>> @@ -264,6 +264,20 @@ acl_get_best_alg(void)
>> return alg[i];
>> }
>>
>> +static void *
>> +zalloc_dft(void *udata, char *name, size_t size, size_t align, int32_t socket_id)
>
> how about acl_mem_default_zalloc?
>
>> +{
>> + (void)udata;
>> + return rte_zmalloc_socket(name, size, align, socket_id);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void
>> +free_dft(void *udata, void *ptr)
>
> how about acl_mem_default_free?
>
>> +{
>> + (void)udata;
>> + rte_free(ptr);
>> +}
>> +
>> RTE_EXPORT_SYMBOL(rte_acl_set_ctx_classify)
>> extern int
>> rte_acl_set_ctx_classify(struct rte_acl_ctx *ctx, enum rte_acl_classify_alg alg)
>> @@ -362,7 +376,7 @@ rte_acl_free(struct rte_acl_ctx *ctx)
>>
>> rte_mcfg_tailq_write_unlock();
>>
>> - rte_free(ctx->mem);
>> + ctx->mem_cb.free(ctx->mem_cb.udata, ctx->mem);
>> rte_free(ctx);
>> rte_free(te);
>> }
>> @@ -425,6 +439,9 @@ rte_acl_create(const struct rte_acl_param *param)
>> ctx->rule_sz = param->rule_size;
>> ctx->socket_id = param->socket_id;
>> ctx->alg = acl_get_best_alg();
>> + ctx->mem_cb.zalloc = zalloc_dft;
>> + ctx->mem_cb.free = free_dft;
>> + ctx->mem_cb.udata = NULL;
>> strlcpy(ctx->name, param->name, sizeof(ctx->name));
>>
>> te->data = (void *) ctx;
>> @@ -555,3 +572,29 @@ rte_acl_list_dump(void)
>> }
>> rte_mcfg_tailq_read_unlock();
>> }
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Set memory allocation callbacks for a given ACL context.
>> + */
>> +RTE_EXPORT_SYMBOL(rte_acl_set_mem_cb)
>
> Should be RTE_EXPORT_EXPERIMENTAL_SYMBOL(rte_acl_set_mem_cb, 26.03)
>
>> +int
>> +rte_acl_set_mem_cb(struct rte_acl_ctx *acl, const struct rte_acl_mem_cb *mcb)
>> +{
>> + if (!acl || !mcb || !mcb->zalloc || !mcb->free)
>
> suggest acl == NULL || mcb == NULL and ...
>
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + memcpy(&acl->mem_cb, mcb, sizeof(struct rte_acl_mem_cb));
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Retrieve the memory allocation callbacks assigned to the ACL context.
>> + */
>> +RTE_EXPORT_SYMBOL(rte_acl_get_mem_cb)
>
> Should be RTE_EXPORT_EXPERIMENTAL_SYMBOL(rte_acl_get_mem_cb, 26.03)
>
>> +int
>> +rte_acl_get_mem_cb(const struct rte_acl_ctx *acl, struct rte_acl_mem_cb *mcb)
>> +{
>> + if (!acl || !mcb)
>
> suggest acl == NULL || mcb == NULL
>
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + memcpy(mcb, &acl->mem_cb, sizeof(struct rte_acl_mem_cb));
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> diff --git a/lib/acl/rte_acl.h b/lib/acl/rte_acl.h
>> index 95354cabb8..e3273556e2 100644
>> --- a/lib/acl/rte_acl.h
>> +++ b/lib/acl/rte_acl.h
>> @@ -136,6 +136,48 @@ struct rte_acl_param {
>> /** @internal opaque ACL handle */
>> struct rte_acl_ctx;
>>
>> +/**
>> + * Memory allocation callbacks for ACL runtime.
>> + */
>> +struct rte_acl_mem_cb {
>
> How about rte_acl_mem_hook ?
> I think hook is better suited to this semantics.
>
>> + /** Allocate zero-initialized memory used during runtime. */
>> + void *(*zalloc)(void *udata, char *name, size_t size, size_t align, int32_t socket_id);
>
> Suggest move udata as the last one parameter.
>
>> +
>> + /** Free memory previously allocated by zalloc(). */
>> + void (*free)(void *udata, void *ptr);
>
> Suggest move udata as the last one parameter.
>
>> +
>> + /** User-provided context passed to allocation/free callbacks. */
>> + void *udata;
>> +};
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * Set memory allocation callbacks for a given ACL context.
>> + *
>> + * @param acl
>> + * The ACL context.
>> + * @param mcb
>> + * Pointer to the memory callback structure
>
> Suggest add one note about when could invoke this API.
>
>> + *
>> + * @return
>> + * 0 on success.
>> + * -EINVAL if parameters are invalid.
>> + */
>
> should add __rte_experimental
>
>> +int rte_acl_set_mem_cb(struct rte_acl_ctx *acl, const struct rte_acl_mem_cb *mcb);
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * Retrieve the memory allocation callbacks assigned to the ACL context.
>> + *
>> + * @param acl
>> + * The ACL context.
>> + * @param mcb
>> + * Output location for the current memory callback structure
>> + *
>> + * @return
>> + * 0 on success.
>> + * -EINVAL if parameters are invalid.
>> + */
>
> should add __rte_experimental
>
>> +int rte_acl_get_mem_cb(const struct rte_acl_ctx *acl, struct rte_acl_mem_cb *mcb);
>> +
>> /**
>> * De-allocate all memory used by ACL context.
>> *
>
> please add descriptor section for packet_classif_access_ctrl.rst and release note.
>
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-02 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-14 2:51 [RFC] rte_acl_build memory fragmentation concern and proposal for external memory support mannywang(王永峰)
2025-11-17 12:51 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2025-11-25 9:40 ` [PATCH] acl: support custom memory allocator =?gb18030?B?bWFubnl3YW5nKM3108C35Sk=?=
2025-11-25 12:06 ` [PATCH v2] " =?gb18030?B?bWFubnl3YW5nKM3108C35Sk=?=
2025-11-25 12:14 ` [PATCH v3] " =?gb18030?B?bWFubnl3YW5nKM3108C35Sk=?=
2025-11-25 14:59 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-26 2:37 ` [Internet]Re: " =?gb18030?B?bWFubnl3YW5nKM3108C35Sk=?=
2025-11-25 18:01 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2025-11-26 2:44 ` [Internet]Re: " =?gb18030?B?bWFubnl3YW5nKM3108C35Sk=?=
2025-11-26 7:57 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2025-11-26 8:09 ` =?gb18030?B?bWFubnl3YW5nKM3108C35Sk=?=
2025-11-26 21:28 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-27 2:05 ` [Internet]Re: " =?gb18030?B?bWFubnl3YW5nKM3108C35Sk=?=
2025-11-28 13:26 ` Konstantin Ananyev
2025-11-28 15:07 ` =?gb18030?B?bWFubnl3YW5nKM3108C35Sk=?=
2025-12-01 12:05 ` [PATCH v4] acl: support custom memory allocators in rte_acl_build =?gb18030?B?bWFubnl3YW5nKM3108C35Sk=?=
2025-12-01 15:59 ` Patrick Robb
2025-12-01 16:42 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-12-02 9:33 ` [Internet]Re: " =?gb18030?B?bWFubnl3YW5nKM3108C35Sk=?=
2025-12-01 12:45 ` [PATCH v5] " =?gb18030?B?bWFubnl3YW5nKM3108C35Sk=?=
2025-12-02 2:47 ` fengchengwen
2025-12-02 9:25 ` [PATCH v6] acl: support custom memory allocators =?gb18030?B?bWFubnl3YW5nKM3108C35Sk=?=
2025-12-02 9:31 ` =?gb18030?B?bWFubnl3YW5nKM3108C35Sk=?= [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1DF1D898A5174549+02f62241-5859-4ba3-9edb-d2c086ec497d@tencent.com \
--to=mannywang@tencent.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com \
--cc=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).