From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A75975A8C for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 02:19:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Dec 2015 17:19:28 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,443,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="843673116" Received: from fmsmsx106.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.204]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Dec 2015 17:19:29 -0800 Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.110.15) by FMSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.248.2; Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:19:27 -0800 Received: from shsmsx101.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.190]) by SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.151]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Fri, 18 Dec 2015 09:19:25 +0800 From: "Liu, Jijiang" To: Thomas Monjalon Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] add virtio offload support in us-vhost Thread-Index: AQHRHULC8mbvq22mpk2gTrwutgYVy56ZCyKAgDcdI9A= Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 01:19:25 +0000 Message-ID: <1ED644BD7E0A5F4091CF203DAFB8E4CC22BF1A37@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> References: <1447330026-16685-1-git-send-email-jijiang.liu@intel.com> <82F45D86ADE5454A95A89742C8D1410E0317BC80@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <82F45D86ADE5454A95A89742C8D1410E0317BC80@shsmsx102.ccr.corp.intel.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" , "Liu, Yuanhan" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] add virtio offload support in us-vhost X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2015 01:19:30 -0000 Hi Thomas, Any comments on this patch set? This patch set have been fully reviewed and tested, but it has not applied = in DPDK2.2. Let me know if you still have some concerns, if not, I will rebased it and = send a version. --Jijiang=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Xu, Qian Q > Sent: Friday, November 13, 2015 3:36 PM > To: Liu, Jijiang; dev@dpdk.org > Cc: Xu, Qian Q > Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] add virtio offload support in us-v= host >=20 > Tested-by: Qian Xu >=20 >=20 > Thanks > Qian > -----Original Message----- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jijiang Liu > Sent: Thursday, November 12, 2015 8:07 PM > To: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/4] add virtio offload support in us-vhost >=20 > Adds virtio offload support in us-vhost. >=20 > The patch set adds the feature negotiation of checksum and TSO between > us-vhost and vanilla Linux virtio guest, and add these offload features > support in the vhost lib, and change vhost sample to test them. >=20 > v5 changes: > Add more clear descriptions to explain these changes. > reset the 'virtio_net_hdr' value in the virtio_enqueue_offload() functi= on. > reorganize patches. >=20 >=20 > v4 change: > remove virtio-net change, only keep vhost changes. > add guest TX offload capabilities to support VM to VM case. > split the cleanup code as a separate patch. >=20 > v3 change: > rebase latest codes. >=20 > v2 change: > fill virtio device information for TX offloads. >=20 > *** BLURB HERE *** >=20 > Jijiang Liu (4): > add vhost offload capabilities > remove ipv4_hdr structure from vhost sample. > add guest offload setting ln the vhost lib. > change vhost application to test checksum and TSO for VM to NIC case >=20 > examples/vhost/main.c | 120 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > lib/librte_vhost/vhost_rxtx.c | 150 > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > lib/librte_vhost/virtio-net.c | 9 ++- > 3 files changed, 259 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) >=20 > -- > 1.7.7.6