From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <jijiang.liu@intel.com>
Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B88758D9F
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 28 Dec 2015 02:46:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26])
 by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Dec 2015 17:46:26 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,488,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="881963496"
Received: from fmsmsx103.amr.corp.intel.com ([10.18.124.201])
 by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 27 Dec 2015 17:46:26 -0800
Received: from shsmsx104.ccr.corp.intel.com (10.239.4.70) by
 FMSMSX103.amr.corp.intel.com (10.18.124.201) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS)
 id 14.3.248.2; Sun, 27 Dec 2015 17:46:26 -0800
Received: from shsmsx101.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.1.111]) by
 SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com ([169.254.5.183]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002;
 Mon, 28 Dec 2015 09:46:25 +0800
From: "Liu, Jijiang" <jijiang.liu@intel.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Thread-Topic: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/6] General tunneling APIs
Thread-Index: AQHRPV74hAPWO2I4C02PeJAlz12jpp7YX2QAgAdIvaA=
Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 01:46:24 +0000
Message-ID: <1ED644BD7E0A5F4091CF203DAFB8E4CC23F3DAC8@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
References: <1450860592-12673-1-git-send-email-jijiang.liu@intel.com>
 <20151223103122.783b6de8@xeon-e3>
In-Reply-To: <20151223103122.783b6de8@xeon-e3>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: 
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: 
x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/6] General tunneling APIs
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Dec 2015 01:46:28 -0000



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:stephen@networkplumber.org]
> Sent: Thursday, December 24, 2015 2:31 AM
> To: Liu, Jijiang
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/6] General tunneling APIs
>=20
> On Wed, 23 Dec 2015 16:49:46 +0800
> Jijiang Liu <jijiang.liu@intel.com> wrote:
>=20
> > 1)at config phase
> >
> > dev_config(port, ...);
> > tunnel_config(port,...);
> > ...
> > dev_start(port);
> > ...
> > rx_burst(port, rxq,... );
> > tx_burst(port, txq,...);
>=20
> What about dynamically adding and deleting multiple tunnels after device
> has started? This would be the more common case in a real world
> environment.
Yes, this makes sense, we will support.