From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB7F8457A0; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 13:58:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B56402C3; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 13:58:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (mail.lysator.liu.se [130.236.254.3]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A95614029C for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 13:58:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.lysator.liu.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id B033636 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 13:58:13 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 89B751FFD2; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 13:58:13 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 (2022-12-13) on hermod.lysator.liu.se X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=disabled version=4.0.0 X-Spam-Score: -1.3 Received: from [192.168.1.86] (h-62-63-215-114.A163.priv.bahnhof.se [62.63.215.114]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.lysator.liu.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 363DA89; Mon, 12 Aug 2024 13:58:11 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <1cd19a85-08be-4c05-b665-f82b1c5095ff@lysator.liu.se> Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2024 13:58:10 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] eal: extend bit manipulation functionality To: Jack Bond-Preston , =?UTF-8?Q?Mattias_R=C3=B6nnblom?= , dev@dpdk.org Cc: Heng Wang , Stephen Hemminger , Joyce Kong , Tyler Retzlaff , =?UTF-8?Q?Morten_Br=C3=B8rup?= References: <20240809090439.589295-2-mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com> <20240809095829.589396-1-mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com> <20240809095829.589396-2-mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com> <89576b74-e45c-4363-abd3-a50480d7aea9@foss.arm.com> Content-Language: en-US From: =?UTF-8?Q?Mattias_R=C3=B6nnblom?= In-Reply-To: <89576b74-e45c-4363-abd3-a50480d7aea9@foss.arm.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On 2024-08-12 13:16, Jack Bond-Preston wrote: > On 09/08/2024 10:58, Mattias Rönnblom wrote: > >> + >> +__RTE_GEN_BIT_TEST(, test,, 32) >> +__RTE_GEN_BIT_SET(, set,, 32) >> +__RTE_GEN_BIT_CLEAR(, clear,, 32) >> +__RTE_GEN_BIT_ASSIGN(, assign,, 32) >> +__RTE_GEN_BIT_FLIP(, flip,, 32) >> + >> +__RTE_GEN_BIT_TEST(, test,, 64) >> +__RTE_GEN_BIT_SET(, set,, 64) >> +__RTE_GEN_BIT_CLEAR(, clear,, 64) >> +__RTE_GEN_BIT_ASSIGN(, assign,, 64) >> +__RTE_GEN_BIT_FLIP(, flip,, 64) > > What is the purpose of the `fun` argument? As opposed to just having > these written out in the macro definitions. I notice the atomic > equivalents don't have this. > It has no purpose, any more. I failed to clean that up, after removing the "once" family of functions. Thanks. >>   /*------------------------ 32-bit relaxed operations >> ------------------------*/ >>   /** >>