From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3138A04B5; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 16:59:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 876071D576; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 16:59:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB05C1D56E for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 16:59:48 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1601650787; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qniLsRfPusHzMX3+20yQNSUVXfMvaHQ/Xw7+MuZ2Cmw=; b=MddHTysiLke+F2RktMMElofFwEtY/20UzcldGbaGTUYu9M+VDSKNemyBM8sgdwpWpof5If hYfZfQFGhPS/LZxtBk1M8ILJ1HG99sDhrjPOKZ/1ZiY76yYTnZN7zIT7eudOFwSbIvIQT6 A/SpI9ZiAWz39x2SxwqH4wKMDdO6wW4= Received: from mail-ot1-f71.google.com (mail-ot1-f71.google.com [209.85.210.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-56-X_BdEhqnM9WDh2oixlQCuA-1; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 10:59:42 -0400 X-MC-Unique: X_BdEhqnM9WDh2oixlQCuA-1 Received: by mail-ot1-f71.google.com with SMTP id 69so702757oth.0 for ; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 07:59:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=qniLsRfPusHzMX3+20yQNSUVXfMvaHQ/Xw7+MuZ2Cmw=; b=NchbWdbbgaP9KeRXjUlVSMmcuVgjpNF/gxr5I9GllwLdf/NQW54B9sUwmyPTZIUCYB l6Al87Rq/YYIumJS4QYsKC8OPxzMpfD77OgtnECm0gHVqbaog3QG7B5glmH65gYHEHUz cMiUlbtj4MpsDHht2K1yfn5pcmdlLrgpiugJEInP0v3ClcCZrUFlgCgeqhmSTCMoMqnv 5JUuPj2qM0CgwkGNPXRAPkKgTlcjKAv7O2nxTC6lKHTqIsvrzf0I/6YrrvCsbIGD1Rhc 9FOfAASXMqMhygMLqK7HQZQ4CbevMo6ehZvkxgNjfJ6kDxOYBCuauIiP5g1xP36h/S1G vTlQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5322CwbIG8jyFsTS8QEcnfrQDM4YxyYMQOVixyZZbBUT2ctFopr7 TJx2CKglfuu6j2UOJDwMt1cHxhiZpLk0QAf84qfGVNNjAqzRPe5X1F6zx3B78APJZMokxTJUQY7 xGNM= X-Received: by 2002:aca:2b02:: with SMTP id i2mr1382535oik.108.1601650781629; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 07:59:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzS3Kewmi0xUqTwx3jysT1WgsFwNlgfzynQsyTBr5YtMy1sLHqNAFEf3kNHR1A6+uQY/mecww== X-Received: by 2002:aca:2b02:: with SMTP id i2mr1382526oik.108.1601650781363; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 07:59:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from trix.remote.csb (075-142-250-213.res.spectrum.com. [75.142.250.213]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z10sm388748ota.70.2020.10.02.07.59.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 02 Oct 2020 07:59:40 -0700 (PDT) To: Thomas Monjalon , "Chautru, Nicolas" Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" References: <20201001143030.9194-1-trix@redhat.com> <3460938.iZNE5J4TDP@thomas> From: Tom Rix Message-ID: <1dbf4aaf-7a77-101d-24ea-6e3faec6165f@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 07:59:39 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3460938.iZNE5J4TDP@thomas> Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=trix@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: New Reviewer entry type added to MAINTAINERS X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 10/1/20 2:54 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 01/10/2020 23:22, Chautru, Nicolas: >> From: trix@redhat.com >>> From: Tom Rix >>> >>> Copied from the Linux kernel MAINTAINERS file. >>> A Reviewer is designated person who wishes to review changes in areas of >>> interest. >>> >>> Added self as Reviewer for baseband. >>> >>> I am a Linux kernel Reviewer for the fpga n3000/vista creek which has >>> several bitstream based baseband devices. So I want to help out here as >>> well. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix >> Thanks for the help. >> Note that they are a few other BBDEV patches in flight for 20.11 on top of the acc100 PMD that you may want to be aware of. >> https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=&submitter=chautru&state=&q=&archive=&delegate= >> >> Acked-by: Nicolas Chautru > [...] >>> Baseband API - EXPERIMENTAL >>> M: Nicolas Chautru >>> +R: Tom Rix > I don't understand the need of differenciating maintainer and reviewer. > If you are trusted enough, why not just being co-maintainer? > I want to help out with the reviews, the reviewer type makes clear this level of commitment. Maintainer is the next, higher level of commitment. Trust wise, this would allow the maintainer verify the reviewer does have the bandwidth to be responsive and effective before committing to sharing responsibility. Tom >