From: "WanRenyong" <wanry@yunsilicon.com>
To: "Stephen Hemminger" <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>, <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/19] net/xsc: add ioctl command interface
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 16:19:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ff7f17e-181b-49da-8f84-bf430f449dec@yunsilicon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240911225021.16839cb2@hermes.local>
On 2024/9/12 13:50, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Sep 2024 12:14:08 +0800
> "WanRenyong" <wanry@yunsilicon.com> wrote:
>
>>>
>>>> +};
>>>> +
>>> Does this device driver depend on some upstr
>> Yes, it depends on linux kernel driver of the device.
>>
>> Hello, Stephen,
>>
>> Thanks for your review, please see above.
> What is the driver? I don't see in the current kernel.org tree.
>
>
> My concern is that if the driver is not upstream, it is probably not
> going to pass the review of kernel developers. This means security and
> API changes would be required.
>
> Ioctl's are considered the worst API to the kernel and unlikely
> to be accepted.
Hello, Stephen,
Thank you for reply.Our kernel driver is being prepared to open source.
Our PMD is going to coexist with kernel driver to support flow
bifurcation feature.
Ioctl API is used for interaction between PMD and kernel driver. As you
said, ioctl is
the worst API, should I consider using read and write instead?
If not, could you please give me some advice?
--
Thanks,
WanRenyong
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-12 8:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-11 2:07 WanRenyong
2024-09-11 3:48 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-09-12 4:07 ` WanRenyong
2024-09-11 3:49 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-09-12 4:07 ` WanRenyong
2024-09-11 3:50 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-09-12 4:14 ` WanRenyong
2024-09-12 5:50 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-09-12 8:19 ` WanRenyong [this message]
2024-09-12 9:18 ` fengchengwen
2024-09-13 2:55 ` WanRenyong
2024-09-14 2:54 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-09-14 6:33 ` fengchengwen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1ff7f17e-181b-49da-8f84-bf430f449dec@yunsilicon.com \
--to=wanry@yunsilicon.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).