From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D07A00C2; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:12:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCC551C1CA; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:12:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6691C0AD for ; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:12:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27D335C0106; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 04:12:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 22 Apr 2020 04:12:22 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= R5x1MmQFDsOwn/Mwdbwbzn/4tTSWLX0QyzdzVTaOY/M=; b=xWP2CNP/2C9U+ge7 l9OQYNW4JplD3AamFTEyKoqZnZl6sC3xR4vq1rlC+mcLxw9xgtDHt6hRA6V0oiPT VX+/iwion4+Rri3UO5CLcMRJuaxSisgG7bUo9nbjbZZYFR0M1J4Ok/yTiRgyGrfl 5yhbzb7CIkb3nCD9rRLzwxshbVk+QKpUnzkLtFgvV9Ivz4Y3Y/Ef1AAPmIgG+SkG 2xuTx/HmocHXHqksWFHxFH0E7J/jsFBcbBlbnTSuac1HwqfpYh9YtzvU4MoTLHiJ CHViF9sCBaqyzZbO15PxIg9gvlpKKUftP32wHbv0wy3n438i1BUOYqT8V5GCa1Lj CDB82g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=R5x1MmQFDsOwn/Mwdbwbzn/4tTSWLX0QyzdzVTaOY /M=; b=QEcvJcAKD1iyAs2M8ekDFuezkrOtruLGnylUsyV5FcpzoN0MYbrl8Yb75 aKvAHDQ4ZQR0p4w/hh/MHyyEOELl+cXNa5QBburprKYqOndvh2qHMtE3RkQlY/bp vkSKpdTAsPofI2MHV4RAKPj682M959EggbgJQbpXQCsQn4YZ+CmZNVjt9FBJya3B GivyznGWmBpSjSZJaJ+uNZLeo5Spvxv7k26LQSqRHpa696S67Ygf+rY+kB/KLuI7 0S1D8WW/7Yx/83mt/jbVgpKaQWsW1NcS0TfkweS6YdXYlPZmZkpyl7ru8+d7jhDd 96YQtpf7ubAx4UQkLi34gWcuu7VSA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrgeeigdduvdegucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecuff homhgrihhnpeihohhuthhusggvrdgtohhmnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudek geenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthh homhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6DE213065C9D; Wed, 22 Apr 2020 04:12:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Konstantin Ananyev , Honnappa Nagarahalli Cc: "olivier.matz@6wind.com" , "david.marchand@redhat.com" , "bruce.richardson@intel.com" , "dev@dpdk.org" , nd Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2020 10:12:18 +0200 Message-ID: <2000536.3Lj2Plt8kZ@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <6060324.K2JlShyGXD@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] time for compiling test_ring.c X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 22/04/2020 07:11, Honnappa Nagarahalli: > > > 22/04/2020 02:05, Honnappa Nagarahalli: > > > > 22/04/2020 02:00, Thomas Monjalon: > > > > > I don't want know why and when, but it seems the file test_ring.c > > > > > became very long to compile, especially with clang. > > > > > > > > What is the compiler version? Is this on master? > > > > > > clang 9.0.1 compiling DPDK master. > > I think, it is the compiler. The issues were observed with clang-7 during the last > > release. Clang-8 worked fine. Still, test_ring.c was re-worked to compile in > > shorter time. Looks like things are back to broken in 9.0.1. > I am able to reproduce, need sometime to come up with a fix. OK thank you. Note that I was not asking for a fix ;-) > > > > Any info on test_ring_perf.c? > > > > > > This one looks slow to compile as well. > > > > > > > > I have no solution to shorten the compilation time, so I propose > > > > > to rename test_ring.c to test_patien.ce. > > > > > Disclosure: I am failing this test :-( > > > > > > The object file takes 5 to 11MB. > > > I don't know how much this test is magic, but I hope it does a lot > > > more than this 256B program: > > > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Imquk_3oFf4