From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F04AA04FD; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 10:15:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBD282A5D; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 10:15:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E13AD29D6 for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 10:15:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BBFD5C00DF; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 04:15:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 10 Jun 2020 04:15:24 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= PPCsIYVlgIGWTw5d97Of4YNSoiE33WGSbdfqlRpJ7Cc=; b=A8Fws1lX9/MBmi74 w/BJ9WGIKoWIKrqbexU49OUSkgY4opq6MjDLEi1+/h+RtVXLo6qEvwmPj8dKjHmb eWrm5ftQ0k+bX3cPq2aKUWyW//33W2HcSZ5/Kzia5pE6Wlv5Sv2gcIkJkwNMgd6b pVtrY3KXAHLl7Rbqu/fh57gmnDIokwzQlKDgnOvJVq5iMmuYv9SOViDIcWaJypcf AciiPEfuZ9Pf2CPuRXPYZJ4zt3OidU0izsQHiji9Sn2kaOgKbibKqHrk1Azp2yC/ X4vOP4+FRXOdwrdZdT7STDstK5ZnUp6wh9O039o/MMB3SExPC+zL/KlJkriwmmBg riZOuA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=PPCsIYVlgIGWTw5d97Of4YNSoiE33WGSbdfqlRpJ7 Cc=; b=HCaQ3gDRsAuU9CDB4fSnjbUC2K8h+4Mc4YFwJwcy6h3pbcVZuxRRSlwjX BJNNc6pHbrL6HrYtHoenhvikbhmOMuqFl71y0dkHIIeJ6sJ1hrtYS3PgrbWXFisr qOTKMazrlZicno3UwBg/J5jQf5yhHT+AJ4k24EpHMUKK7/b/Yw4wq2qE4Bciwd+G HWYT74rBL7gY/CQ1Kqu9l1tk40/pVjee923ONOVoWwRKXXKXZzjkjGaVuD72xWN3 kxRXJlhwq3sdDyFn4ymH6hBfRrqtrYn6D9F+bQDlaYPazEH7H1ZWc+DQcnd56ma7 1k6PbbW++7IJg/IWBS6duiuEeYzxQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrudehiedgtdefucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 3846F30618B7; Wed, 10 Jun 2020 04:15:23 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Dan Gora Cc: Mattias =?ISO-8859-1?Q?R=F6nnblom?= , dev@dpdk.org, Luca Boccassi , David Marchand , Jerin Jacob , bruce.richardson@intel.com Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 10:15:21 +0200 Message-ID: <2005957.V7vgbo76UW@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20200421195446.1730-1-dg@adax.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] eal: resolve getentropy at run time for random seed X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 09/06/2020 17:37, Dan Gora: > On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 2:10 AM Dan Gora wrote: > > > > Can these patches be considered again for 20.08? > > > > I thought that I addressed all of the issues or at least provided > > reasonable responses to all of the concerns. > > So I guess I'll take that as a "no"... > > I have to admit that I just laughed when I read the recent thread > about "why or why cannot we not expand our community?" > > This is a big part of it. It seems there is a communication issue in this thread. Some maintainers look to be against the solution, and you seem frustrated because of a blocked usage issue. Please could you explain what is the initial user problem? It seems you want to run a recent DPDK with an old glibc. Am I right?