From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pb0-f47.google.com (mail-pb0-f47.google.com [209.85.160.47]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 309C01F3 for ; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 01:58:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pb0-f47.google.com with SMTP id rr4so4701169pbb.6 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 16:59:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ud7NtQ1GckVTnKT6xlKR1NN1CFzaUL74FN18fsVB2T0=; b=mHSMLg1+ehazLqlJY/LNp+eijaSzBZ+Jk4ZyucK7LdTRpUvtPiZH1I1vEH2nmDGSPp f+SguRyxvWXvNFLE8rARq9tD6a1Zfz9NVs5GqCJQEtz6B2pRI5nSMKelMKKsh247sQp0 bTfxFLkztnPI52APe+467sMsshCwLXaQVm2Jwxf/H2tMFqOSSlubDVSewuwuYkG9U4iM cuQ0BLI7UXxaLFswjMxUGjZM2AAUmhgHPxP2KlfvzSekNyevl7Ag3yWkpjTtxgp145WX LyP66bRC9Se++Yz+Nd7N9eFEkiikCL0WC60JHqM/xWLQcGeFZNgxeTJSV38m9xlrsSGi XtoQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm3pbwTI6eq0dbd4dYSEMH77Rg21vh6qGTPzLxoG9ns0ouy1OPVgmmok7kYr7YlLokIlEcb X-Received: by 10.66.136.131 with SMTP id qa3mr33492827pab.77.1379375976676; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 16:59:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net (static-50-53-69-237.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net. [50.53.69.237]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u7sm33929505pbf.12.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 16 Sep 2013 16:59:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 16:59:33 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Thomas Monjalon Message-ID: <20130916165933.2421a45e@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> In-Reply-To: <1570236.KP93u3nrzz@x220> References: <1379363340-20870-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> <1570236.KP93u3nrzz@x220> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: fix non-Intel devices probing X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 23:58:59 -0000 I agree with Thomas, the check is not needed. After this all settles out, I have a patch to add support for I/O resource tracking in base DPDK. It makes it easier to do the right thing in drivers that need to use I/O instead of memory.