From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wi0-f175.google.com (mail-wi0-f175.google.com
 [209.85.212.175]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F960156
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 09:54:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id hi5so390752wib.8
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:55:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:organization:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc
 :references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type
 :content-transfer-encoding:message-id;
 bh=01dX3l7fGV2h4+Lzk7OGc5VnV3ouH2e3POvxAvcu/Tw=;
 b=hKDn623T6BRrx65W0PttxvrGI2c12gBBjyv2KsfSKln6629+fX9NsDl7tPvyKK/Xmv
 Dk9lQ3G0QWfr4SDN+KSVuxWaiPM1VGlx1oKIbagZx1ihIfv/owJ85BIs4d5UNfHh19oV
 mXCN/+nFKUtNEVS3wkdF8K+8JiAnAPSKIb7E8Djq8SZNu+RVLUZqc4nZ+VeD3tptbg3b
 CVHunTVuR6LZPHacNRYf8q1R6cRpGNoKUmsYgEZ6tVJ9c3RgNXMOejK3pj7n6k3iRAWW
 lMVI9bHA0h5MzcdawrnPsfK8IVgw5rsWKs2eW1XaHC3Fe7tPhPXhZT9z+qAhcQjllM24
 Ud6g==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkkheUvfGn1GleDhyU3ZHc05DWWJYw2iIjJZiKHnTFSgJmZjb727ssqlwXYHG+eUkElOaWx
X-Received: by 10.194.173.163 with SMTP id bl3mr9655452wjc.10.1385110511916;
 Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:55:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from angus.localnet (6wind.net2.nerim.net. [213.41.180.237])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w20sm13609035wia.5.2013.11.22.00.55.10
 for <multiple recipients>
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Fri, 22 Nov 2013 00:55:11 -0800 (PST)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Organization: 6WIND
To: Ognjen Joldzic <ognjen.joldzic@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 09:55:09 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; )
References: <CAArUB1gNjCScrPbmCS6QNwdWn7zPgddescyMOg+qfzNN+uX8Dw@mail.gmail.com>
 <2031360.6MEvh5xnbq@x220>
 <CAArUB1iHoG7SVkRC6O1h0eWkEmiKjOtvN1ie04y4HJ7G=MzUBA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAArUB1iHoG7SVkRC6O1h0eWkEmiKjOtvN1ie04y4HJ7G=MzUBA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <201311220955.09373.thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 82546EB Copper issue
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 08:54:13 -0000

22/11/2013 08:30, Ognjen Joldzic :
> Actually, the support for 82546EB Copper NIC is already there. All it takes
> to make it work is one line in rte_pci_dev_ids.h:
> 
> RTE_PCI_DEV_ID_DECL_EM(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, E1000_DEV_ID_82546EB_COPPER)
> 
> Not much of a patch, I guess :)

Please, I would prefer a real patch signed by you.

Thank you
-- 
Thomas