From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06909159 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:03:47 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id bs8so2561179wib.17 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 09:05:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:organization :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=6A3KBXrNFuejTr1c7V3Ve3u+q2SNsQL2Alz8BdeP40c=; b=Sc2R41q37xSMpvKeX4TBwSd5z0bslzSGE8NwQ+0LDE5Y46fxSPIqIR0IE1zCQxGo1K etNfxU9T5K1O23Snz4HURoVO+MLBuN3Re98yaL71IsGZszgaFJDgRwgopy+jNTIGsBQA mxqelEEj7yq3glsElPQKOB8IuipkayVrpmQbWuDIK89skNLrek/wQ9QEi/f+e34ra3QJ rNfVIMssL3NjUg/b/O89OXckOi8hQwqrDcCaBA7GWEuK6gqNZhkBf1zFeeFtgMpWhEnV ohn/OobsE7lgDBDnA5q+Q/k1Ws7lKx5zcyD9KDFt6zV1ab8PILuyromfOnGhCD3/wp7f Q83w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkdk45goCsVZTVMe8kiOGUrhjmPg9sASpHFBDvydnHu+mRPAa5P1ujXc9VAK6SPMlmaG9ZQ X-Received: by 10.180.8.170 with SMTP id s10mr16528025wia.35.1395677108186; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 09:05:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (6wind.net2.nerim.net. [213.41.180.237]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id i7sm39887217wib.1.2014.03.24.09.05.06 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 24 Mar 2014 09:05:07 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: dev@dpdk.org Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 17:05:06 +0100 Message-ID: <2013613.PEXE7VeOQE@xps13> Organization: 6WIND User-Agent: KMail/4.12.3 (Linux/3.13.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.12.3; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <3378875.vgnsJ2253J@xps13> References: <20140318135859.53fac97c@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> <3378875.vgnsJ2253J@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] patchwork for dpdk.org? X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 16:03:48 -0000 19/03/2014 11:28, Thomas Monjalon: > 18/03/2014 16:31, Kyle Mestery: > > stephen@networkplumber.org wrote: > > > Anybody considered setting up patchwork to track patches on this list? > > > > > > If not familiar, patchwork is a back end which maintainers and > > > developers > > > can keep track of patches submitted and make sure of the status > > > (accepted, > > > rejected, review, etc). > > > > +1 for patchwork. > > I agree. Installing patchwork on dpdk.org is planned. It seems that patchwork is only tested with Apache. But dpdk.org uses nginx. If someone has experience with such configuration, feedbacks are welcome. -- Thomas