From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Received: from mail-pa0-f41.google.com (mail-pa0-f41.google.com
 [209.85.220.41]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA7CBB0B1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 14 May 2014 18:41:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-pa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id lj1so1901962pab.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 14 May 2014 09:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
 :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=3xymWgzeOP8ZkDeVREa2erNxMCMxIJNjkt0I8iNx/Co=;
 b=VAfg1etBfoJhzna4nEOIbHCRj/gPEj2xWRq9g+fYJX8pSVxFn1w4HREPjGG5MJED8T
 LRYgBsK/S5kz/ierT46Lvr0Gu/nqmJDWDu5s7QCIvjLi4ilyyLxf/YkjxWUEDOwzxhJB
 KsZAMW2qCcadY1KCtLU9hhN2YoCyLy3BgxODYJFYTErd9IkFPlFZpZnJZ5hvnuAHdPlT
 oOogOeKQOL70QvOjXbEPw0l1Xj9kfM2xsdHRAFLgUE4jzcwRcIK+h6x7aJ61Q8IvxAVJ
 giphSoBVNfZCjk4IhL9vQn0w6wdz3gcyxkjStXnlaxWyOykLCdvFwkcLLHtusXCOHXcv
 vlXw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnRM9nzTVYqQKHxyo1amxC3127WG8zlU33Xk5eWeaQaqGInQ6w1tz3TatxhVneXOYhirlcc
X-Received: by 10.66.221.99 with SMTP id qd3mr5899232pac.46.1400085722293;
 Wed, 14 May 2014 09:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net
 (static-50-53-83-51.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net. [50.53.83.51])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gg3sm4387107pbc.34.2014.05.14.09.42.01
 for <multiple recipients>
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
 Wed, 14 May 2014 09:42:02 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 09:41:59 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Message-ID: <20140514094159.435928e3@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
In-Reply-To: <1559974.KXN93MZ8m0@xps13>
References: <20140514081932.37847146@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
 <1559974.KXN93MZ8m0@xps13>
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] Don't inline string functions
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 16:41:55 -0000

On Wed, 14 May 2014 17:47:01 +0200
Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> wrote:

> 2014-05-14 08:19, Stephen Hemminger:
> > It makes no sense to inline string functions, in fact snprintf
> > can't be inlined because the function supports variable number of
> > arguments.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> > 
> > ---
> > Resend because of lack of response
> 
> Please do not resend patches. I prefer a ping request in the original thread.
> 
> By the way, you didn't take into account my first comments:
> 	http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-April/002028.html

All the issues there are changed. includes, copyright etc.


> and I'm still waiting answers to these patches:
> 	http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-March/001673.html

This is in the rte_sched group. patch 1

> 	http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2014-March/001676.html

This is more of a mess than want to get into right now.
header conflicts are nuisance.