From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.mhcomputing.net (master.mhcomputing.net [74.208.46.186]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF8492E8B for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 10:10:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.mhcomputing.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7437980C4EE; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 01:14:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 01:14:59 -0700 From: Matthew Hall To: "Ni, Xun" Message-ID: <20140827081459.GA8217@mhcomputing.net> References: <91E2D863603AD4478F101CE81E76E45D01B5DFE8@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <91E2D863603AD4478F101CE81E76E45D01B5DFE8@SHSMSX103.ccr.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] is there any function like rte_mempool_destroy compare with rte_mempool_create X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 08:10:57 -0000 On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 07:46:26AM +0000, Ni, Xun wrote: > If I run an application twice, is there possible that > the app has the memory leak? Or it just doesn't have enough memory to > execute it again because the first one already get most of the memory but > without release it. User-mapped memory should be freed by the kernel when the process dies. However if there is multiprocess, shmem, or kernel resources being used in your configuration anything could happen, including leaks. Do you have some specifics about what you were doing / running? Matthew.