From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <mhall@mhcomputing.net>
Received: from mail.mhcomputing.net (master.mhcomputing.net [74.208.46.186])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DABAA7E33
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu,  9 Oct 2014 00:34:35 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail.mhcomputing.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id 1D73480C50B; Wed,  8 Oct 2014 15:41:11 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 15:41:11 -0700
From: Matthew Hall <mhall@mhcomputing.net>
To: "Pattan, Reshma" <reshma.pattan@intel.com>
Message-ID: <20141008224111.GC29243@mhcomputing.net>
References: <3AEA2BF9852C6F48A459DA490692831FE21954@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3AEA2BF9852C6F48A459DA490692831FE21954@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC] librte_reorder: new reorder library
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 22:34:36 -0000

On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 09:33:06AM +0000, Pattan, Reshma wrote:
> To be used along with distributor library. Next version of distributor are 
> planned to distribute incoming packets to all worker cores irrespective of 
> the flow type. In this case to ensure in order delivery of the packets at 
> output side reorder library will used by the tx end.

Hello,

I am trying to understand, why is usage of the RSS options on the RX Queues 
insufficient to keep the packets ordered per-flow on the TX Queues?

Thanks,
Matthew.