From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.tuxdriver.com (charlotte.tuxdriver.com [70.61.120.58]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BC147E33 for ; Thu, 9 Oct 2014 00:48:33 +0200 (CEST) Received: from cpe-098-026-066-094.nc.res.rr.com ([98.26.66.94] helo=localhost) by smtp.tuxdriver.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Xc08z-0001ZE-MM; Wed, 08 Oct 2014 18:55:43 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2014 18:55:41 -0400 From: Neil Horman To: Matthew Hall Message-ID: <20141008225540.GA15850@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> References: <3AEA2BF9852C6F48A459DA490692831FE21954@IRSMSX109.ger.corp.intel.com> <20141008224111.GC29243@mhcomputing.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20141008224111.GC29243@mhcomputing.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--) X-Spam-Status: No Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH RFC] librte_reorder: new reorder library X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2014 22:48:33 -0000 On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 03:41:11PM -0700, Matthew Hall wrote: > On Tue, Oct 07, 2014 at 09:33:06AM +0000, Pattan, Reshma wrote: > > To be used along with distributor library. Next version of distributor are > > planned to distribute incoming packets to all worker cores irrespective of > > the flow type. In this case to ensure in order delivery of the packets at > > output side reorder library will used by the tx end. > > Hello, > > I am trying to understand, why is usage of the RSS options on the RX Queues > insufficient to keep the packets ordered per-flow on the TX Queues? > I think because there is a possibility that multiple workers may be used for a single tx queue. Neil > Thanks, > Matthew. >