From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Received: from smtp.tuxdriver.com (charlotte.tuxdriver.com [70.61.120.58])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B3F595B
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 16:14:13 +0100 (CET)
Received: from nat-pool-rdu-t.redhat.com ([66.187.233.202] helo=localhost)
 by smtp.tuxdriver.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.63)
 (envelope-from <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>)
 id 1XoZly-0003Qv-Ks; Wed, 12 Nov 2014 10:23:59 -0500
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 10:23:49 -0500
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
To: "De Lara Guarch, Pablo" <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
Message-ID: <20141112152349.GA7554@localhost.localdomain>
References: <1A791056FCD70F458405B58B79F5C2F7069C605F@RAD-W2KSRV11.radcom.co.il>
 <CAFLKUzK2iiZRTdRETujAX_sd2Jdp=uUwnMgHdQEA3dx9CxdRTQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <E115CCD9D858EF4F90C690B0DCB4D8972683612A@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <E115CCD9D858EF4F90C690B0DCB4D8972683612A@IRSMSX108.ger.corp.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Spam-Score: -2.9 (--)
X-Spam-Status: No
Cc: "<dev@dpdk.org>" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] compile dpdk with no avx
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 15:14:13 -0000

On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 02:24:10PM +0000, De Lara Guarch, Pablo wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Masaru Oki
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 1:48 PM
> > To: Yaron Illouz
> > Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] compile dpdk with no avx
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Some libraries need AVX instruction, but if you don't use, it can disable.
> >   e.g. CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_PMD=n in config file.
> > 
> > 
> > 2014-11-12 21:45 GMT+09:00 Yaron Illouz <yaroni@radcom.com>:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > I use dpdk in my product. I can't change my dpdk version.
> > >
> > > I compile it on a server that have avx.
> > >
> > > Most of the time, it run on machine that have avx, but not always.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > When running the product on a machine with no avx, it crash on illegal
> > > instruction.
> > >
> > > The current solution is to build it on a computer with no avx.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Is there a compilation flag to disable avx? So it doesn't matter on
> > > which computer I compiled it.
> 
> Basically, you are looking at cross-compiling DPDK. One thing you could do
>  is go to one of the config files (i.e. defconfig_x86-64-native-linuxapp-gcc) 
> and change CONFIG_RTE_MACHINE, from "native" to one of the
>  micro-architectures that do not have avx, such as "wsm" (Westmere).
> 
What version of dpdk are you running?  We fixed this a while ago with
commits 8777aabc538fdac24457958eaab929f33d6c4cdf and
074f54ad03ee0c84dcae235933e2b426208fe591.  They do runtime checking for
availability of the AVX and SSE3 instructions and only exeucte paths using those
instructions if the running cpu supports them.  Note that you are still required
to build for the default arch.
Neil

> Regards,
> Pablo
> 
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Compile flag
> > >
> > > defconfig_x86_64-default-linuxapp-gcc
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Dpdk version
> > >
> > > PACKAGE_VERSION_MAJOR_NUMBER=1
> > >
> > > PACKAGE_VERSION_MINOR_NUMBER=6
> > >
> > > PACKAGE_VERSION_PATCH_NUMBER=0
> > >
> > > PACKAGE_VERSION_BUILD_NUMBER=18
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Gcc version
> > >
> > > gcc (GCC) 4.4.6 20120305 (Red Hat 4.4.6-4)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > OS
> > >
> > > CentOS release 6.3 (Final)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >