From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7ED17F89 for ; Thu, 13 Nov 2014 13:57:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Nov 2014 05:06:10 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,377,1413270000"; d="scan'208";a="607219359" Received: from bricha3-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.237.220.93]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 13 Nov 2014 05:06:08 -0800 Received: by (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 13 Nov 2014 13:06:07 +0025 Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 13:06:07 +0000 From: Bruce Richardson To: Thomas Monjalon Message-ID: <20141113130607.GC9932@bricha3-MOBL3> References: <1403814160-19613-1-git-send-email-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <1490990.YgXjR9vjuX@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1490990.YgXjR9vjuX@xps13> Organization: Intel Shannon Ltd. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] skeleton app: Very simple code for l2fwding X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 13 Nov 2014 12:57:44 -0000 On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:20:46PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Hi Bruce, > > 2014-06-26 21:22, Bruce Richardson: > > This is a very simple example app for doing packet forwarding with the > > Intel DPDK. It's designed to serve as a start point for people new to > > the Intel DPDK and who want to develop a new app. > > > > Therefore it's meant to: > > * have as good a performance out-of-the-box as possible, using the > > best-known settings for configuring the PMDs, so that any new apps can > > be based off it. > > * be kept as short as possible to make it easy to understand it and get > > started with it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson > > What about a rebase of this patch now that Rx/Tx default conf is > available in API? > Yes, I've did some work on doing so, just need to finish it up and I can resubmit it soon, I hope. /Bruce