DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
To: Vijayakumar Muthuvel Manickam <mmvijay@gmail.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Running 32bit secondary with 64bit primary DPDK process
Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2014 08:48:01 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141206134801.GA13596@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADJ2ZGPJxNXxd3HxTWgJqywfv9xxx+kaXjNxcePy5PiCwE+S9w@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 11:58:10PM -0800, Vijayakumar Muthuvel Manickam wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have a patch that enables 32bit secondary DPDK processes to attach with
> 64bit primary DPDK process and share the mempool and ring datastructures. I
> developed this patch to enable our product(from Brocade) which uses a 32bit
> userspace network stack to be able to work with PMDs like ivshmem and some
> proprietary PMDs that are available only for 64bit version of the primary
> process.
> 
> To achieve this,
> 1) I changed the mmap() of hugepages in primary process to use MAP_32BIT
> flag so that all hugepages are mapped within the 4GB virtual address limit
> and
> 2) Added a dummy pad_pointer member variable next to each pointer member
> within the shared datastructures like struct rte_ring, struct
> rte_mempool, struct rte_pktmbuf, TAILQ_HEAD, struct hugepage_file that both
> primary and secondary share.
> 
> I have been able to successfully run a 64bit primary process with multiple
> 32bit secondary processes doing packet processing with the pipeline model.
> 
> I would like to know if this compatibility support is of interest to the
> community and if so I can submit my patch.
> 
> Thanks,
> Vijay
> 

It never hurts to post something.
Neil

      reply	other threads:[~2014-12-06 13:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-06  7:58 Vijayakumar Muthuvel Manickam
2014-12-06 13:48 ` Neil Horman [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141206134801.GA13596@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=mmvijay@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).