From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76252E81 for ; Fri, 30 Jan 2015 04:39:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Jan 2015 19:36:17 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,490,1418112000"; d="scan'208";a="644856482" Received: from bricha3-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.254.76.163]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 29 Jan 2015 19:39:35 -0800 Received: by (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 29 Jan 2015 20:39:34 -0600 Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 20:39:34 -0700 From: Bruce Richardson To: "Liang, Cunming" Message-ID: <20150130033930.GB2240@bricha3-MOBL3> References: <1421637666-16872-1-git-send-email-helin.zhang@intel.com> <1422501365-12643-1-git-send-email-helin.zhang@intel.com> <1422501365-12643-5-git-send-email-helin.zhang@intel.com> <20150129233027.GB11276@bricha3-MOBL3> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Shannon Ltd. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 04/17] ixgbe: support of unified packet type X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2015 03:39:38 -0000 On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 11:52:03PM +0000, Liang, Cunming wrote: > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Richardson, Bruce > > Sent: Thursday, January 29, 2015 4:30 PM > > To: Zhang, Helin > > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Cao, Waterman; Liang, Cunming; Liu, Jijiang; Ananyev, > > Konstantin > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/17] ixgbe: support of unified packet type > > > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 11:15:52AM +0800, Helin Zhang wrote: > > > To unify packet types among all PMDs, bit masks of packet type for > > > ol_flags are replaced by unified packet type for Vector PMD. > > > > > > > Two suggestions on the commit log: > > 1. Can you add scalar and vector into the titles to make it clear how this > > patch and the previous ones differ > > 2. Can you add a note calling out performance impacts for this patch. If no > > performance impacts, then please note that for reviewers. > [Liang, Cunming] Accept, will update it in v2. > For performance, lose 1 cycle per packet during 4x10GE io fwd loopback unit test. > Good to know, thanks. /Bruce