From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com (mail-we0-f169.google.com [74.125.82.169]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212D05A85 for ; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 21:47:13 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id u56so32699533wes.0 for ; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 12:47:12 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yb2BWd4ffNdRjGbnWoxvXnFqQL3rEmJ5P6O3TlsxzH8=; b=hSnpuadApdQ/IBUfY/P+/QixczJfSv0lwkgnh7ZeIhbfPH8ZhMg0+gD2D6Mmjg4nhn cDunyVvA5UseFA1YlkW/0lagNJvEjfuliB5vI84/gIj35G4nQGNzMWEXWagD8jtmXQ8f 9DR4sLSU0M/exAEIxFN8hXlFpvZtD/G6zTMjBzZrbLT7SO6Ug67GG0zCPdJkv+N/1Sne /NXvY+1DJynisNowKzgj6fRpWSLeugZOg9cHrdHqcIJGTY34FHFFp9NIGTyj+Gzycigv OilucAbpFp+Gy+rJ+A8x9RFIwTJsEZL0CWoGB+iHQW3tQccinbi5j4iTN8HgnhhVisaN 0wbQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmXe6MQDde+q5hHWUEcpqqi3RpV9Subc3iByr9vNGd++WStiWNrrd2wpKs1uDsMwoWHPrvs X-Received: by 10.194.143.109 with SMTP id sd13mr5959887wjb.70.1422737232278; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 12:47:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from uryu.home.lan ([212.76.224.242]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id q10sm20641483wjr.41.2015.01.31.12.47.11 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 31 Jan 2015 12:47:11 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 20:47:10 +0000 From: Stephen Hemminger To: dev@dpdk.org Message-ID: <20150131204710.2bf9f5fa@uryu.home.lan> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [dpdk-dev] Making DPDK.org more vendor neutral X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 20:47:13 -0000 I think that DPDK.org should be as neutral in all public communications. This bothers me: "If you need some specific drivers or networking stacks, you should contact a company that provides such extensions." This tag line is a link to page describing 6wind and other vendors leaves a biased taint on the initial impression. It would be best to only put in historical data about the contributing companies and a vague reference to commercial support being available. It is not like kernel.org has links to SUSE and RHEL. We need to make DPDK.org independent.