From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Stefan Puiu <stefan.puiu@gmail.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] upper limit on the size of allocation through rte_malloc in dpdk-1.8.0?
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2015 11:00:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150206110014.GA16144@bricha3-MOBL3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACKs7VDkpaBH4Gv1iWmiqmwjdPJnjL0nnWB2JYqWNqdW3+j-LQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:24:58PM +0200, Stefan Puiu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to alter an existing program to use the Intel DPDK. I'm
> using 1.8.0, compiled by me as a shared library
> (CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_COMBINE_LIBS=y and CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_SHARED_LIB=y in
> .config) on Ubuntu 12.04. The program needs to allocate large blocks
> of memory (between 1 and 4 chunks of 4.5GB, also 1-4 chunks of 2.5
> GB). I tried changing my C++ code to use an array allocated using
> rte_malloc() instead of the std::vector I was using beforehand, but it
> seems the call to rte_malloc() fails. I then made a simple test
> program using the DPDK that takes a size to allocate and if that
> fails, tries again with sizes of 100MB less, basically the code below.
> This is C++ code (well, now that I look it could've been plain C, but
> I need C++) compiled with g++-4.6 with '-std=gnu++0x':
>
> int main(int argc, char **argv)
> {
> int ret = rte_eal_init(argc, argv);
> if (ret < 0)
> rte_exit(EXIT_FAILURE, "Invalid EAL arguments\n");
> argc -= ret;
> argv += ret;
>
> [... check argc >= 2]
> size_t size = strtoul(argv[1], NULL, 10);
> size_t s = size;
>
> for (size_t i = 0; i < 30; ++i) {
> printf("Trying to allocate %'zu bytes\n", s);
> buf = rte_malloc("test", s, 0);
> if (!buf)
> printf ("Failed!\n");
> else {
> printf ("Success!\n");
> rte_free(buf);
> break;
> }
>
> s = s - (100 * 1024ULL * 1024ULL);
> }
>
> return 0;
> }
>
> I'm getting:
> Trying to allocate 4,832,038,656 bytes
> Failed!
> Trying to allocate 4,727,181,056 bytes
> Failed!
> [...]
> Trying to allocate 2,944,601,856 bytes
> Success!
>
> It's not always the same value, but usually somewhere around 3GB
> rte_malloc() succeeds. I'm running on a physical (non-VM) NUMA machine
> with 2 physical CPUs, each having 64GBs of local memory. The machine
> also runs Ubuntu 12.04 server. I've created 16384 hugepages of 2MB:
>
> echo 16384 > /sys/devices/system/node/node0/hugepages/hugepages-2048kB/nr_hugepages
>
> I'm running the basic app like this:
>
> sudo numactl --membind=0 ~/src/test/dpdk_test/alloc -c 1f -n 4 -w
> 04:00.0 --socket-mem=16384,0 -- 4832038656
>
> I'm trying to run only on NUMA node 0 and only allocate memory from
> there - that's what the app I'm moving to the DPDK works like (using
> numactl --membind=x and --cpunodebind=x).
>
> Is there an upper limit on the amount of memory rte_malloc() will try
> to allocate? I tried both after a reboot and when the machine had been
> running for a while with not much success. Am I missing something?
> It's a bit weird to be only able to allocate 3GB out of the 32GB
> assigned to the app...
>
> On a related note, what would be a good way to compile the DPDK with
> debug info (and preferably -O0)? There's quite a web of .mk files used
> and I haven't figured out where the optimization level / debug options
> are set.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Stefan.
Does your system support 1G pages? I would recommend using a smaller number of
1G pages vs the huge number of 2MB pages that you are currently using. There
may be issues with the allocations failing due to a lack of contiguous blocks
of memory due to the 2MB pages being spread across memory.
Regards,
/Bruce
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-06 11:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-04 15:24 Stefan Puiu
2015-02-06 11:00 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2015-02-06 11:25 ` Olivier MATZ
2015-02-10 16:53 ` Stefan Puiu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150206110014.GA16144@bricha3-MOBL3 \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=stefan.puiu@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).