From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: xuelin.shi@freescale.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] librte_lpm: use field access instead of type conversion.
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:17:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150212111745.GA10216@bricha3-MOBL3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1423635179-24903-1-git-send-email-xuelin.shi@freescale.com>
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 02:12:59PM +0800, xuelin.shi@freescale.com wrote:
> From: Xuelin Shi <xuelin.shi@freescale.com>
>
> struct tbl_entry{
> uint8_t next_hop;
> uint8_t valid :1;
> uint8_t valid_group :1;
> uint8_t depth :6
> }
> uint16_t tbl = (uint16_t)tbl_entry;
> next_hop = (uint8_t)tbl;
>
> next_hop cannot get the correct value of the field
> if the cpu arch is BIG_ENDIAN.
>
> change it to field access.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xuelin Shi <xuelin.shi@freescale.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h | 7 +++++--
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h
> index 586300b..1af150c 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h
> @@ -273,6 +273,7 @@ rte_lpm_lookup(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t ip, uint8_t *next_hop)
> {
> unsigned tbl24_index = (ip >> 8);
> uint16_t tbl_entry;
> + struct rte_lpm_tbl8_entry *entry;
>
> /* DEBUG: Check user input arguments. */
> RTE_LPM_RETURN_IF_TRUE(((lpm == NULL) || (next_hop == NULL)), -EINVAL);
> @@ -290,8 +291,10 @@ rte_lpm_lookup(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t ip, uint8_t *next_hop)
> tbl_entry = *(const uint16_t *)&lpm->tbl8[tbl8_index];
> }
>
> - *next_hop = (uint8_t)tbl_entry;
> - return (tbl_entry & RTE_LPM_LOOKUP_SUCCESS) ? 0 : -ENOENT;
> + entry = (struct rte_lpm_tbl8_entry *)&tbl_entry;
> + *next_hop = entry->next_hop;
> +
> + return (entry->valid) ? 0 : -ENOENT;
> }
>
> /**
> --
> 1.9.1
>
I've run a quick test using "lpm_autotest" inside the test app, and on my (Intel)
platform, this patch has a small (but none-the-less significant) performance
regression. How about the below as an alternative fix?
/Bruce
diff --git a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h
index 586300b..de6f1cb 100644
--- a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h
+++ b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h
@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
#include <stdint.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <rte_branch_prediction.h>
+#include <rte_byteorder.h>
#include <rte_memory.h>
#include <rte_common.h>
#include <rte_common_vect.h>
@@ -287,7 +288,8 @@ rte_lpm_lookup(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t ip, uint8_t *next_hop)
unsigned tbl8_index = (uint8_t)ip +
((uint8_t)tbl_entry * RTE_LPM_TBL8_GROUP_NUM_ENTRIES);
- tbl_entry = *(const uint16_t *)&lpm->tbl8[tbl8_index];
+ tbl_entry = rte_cpu_to_le_16(
+ *(const uint16_t *)&lpm->tbl8[tbl8_index]);
}
*next_hop = (uint8_t)tbl_entry;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-12 11:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-11 6:12 xuelin.shi
2015-02-12 11:17 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2015-02-13 3:42 ` Xuelin Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150212111745.GA10216@bricha3-MOBL3 \
--to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=xuelin.shi@freescale.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).