DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Raz Amir <razamir22@gmail.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] pci: save list of detached devices, and re-probe during driver unload
Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 13:32:46 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150303133246.GB11084@bricha3-MOBL3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1424932400-66862-1-git-send-email-razamir22@gmail.com>

On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 06:33:20AM +0000, Raz Amir wrote:
> Added code that saves the pointers to the detached devices, during
> driver loading, and during driver unloading, go over the list,
> and re-attach them by calling device_probe_and_attach
> on each device.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Raz Amir <razamir22@gmail.com>

Couple of minor comments below. Otherwise all looks good to me. 

Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> index 5ae8560..7d702a5 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/nic_uio/nic_uio.c
> @@ -55,6 +55,9 @@ __FBSDID("$FreeBSD$");
>  
>  #define MAX_BARS (PCIR_MAX_BAR_0 + 1)
>  
> +#define MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES	128
> +static device_t detached_devices[MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES] = {};
> +static int last_detached = 0;
Maybe num_detached/nb_detached or even just "detached" instead of "last_detached".

>  
>  struct nic_uio_softc {
>  	device_t        dev_t;
> @@ -291,14 +294,35 @@ nic_uio_load(void)
>  		if (dev != NULL)

We are getting into some serious levels of indentation below, so maybe flip
this condition around and put in a "continue" instead, so that we can dedent
everything below that follows it.

>  			for (i = 0; i < NUM_DEVICES; i++)
>  				if (pci_get_vendor(dev) == devices[i].vend &&
> -						pci_get_device(dev) == devices[i].dev)
> +						pci_get_device(dev) == devices[i].dev) {
> +							if (last_detached+1 < MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES) {
I don't think you need the +1 here.

> +								printf("nic_uio_load: detaching and storing dev=%p\n", dev);
> +								detached_devices[last_detached++] = dev;
> +							}
> +							else {
> +								printf("nic_uio_load: reached MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES=%d. dev=%p won't be reattached\n",
> +									MAX_DETACHED_DEVICES, dev);
> +							}
DPDK coding style is not to put braces around single-line statements like this.


> +								
Remove whitespace from this new line.

>  							device_detach(dev);
> +				}
>  	}
>  }
>  
>  static void
>  nic_uio_unload(void)
>  {
> +	int i;
> +	printf("nic_uio_unload: entered ... \n");
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < last_detached; i++) {
> +		printf("nic_uio_unload: calling to device_probe_and_attach for dev=%p...\n",
> +			detached_devices[i]);
> +		device_probe_and_attach(detached_devices[i]);
> +		printf("nic_uio_unload: done.\n");
> +	}
> +
> +	printf("nic_uio_unload: leaving ... \n");
>  }
>  
>  static int
> -- 
> 2.1.2
> 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-03 13:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-26  6:33 Raz Amir
2015-03-01 13:48 ` Neil Horman
2015-03-01 14:21   ` Raz Amir
2015-03-01 17:16     ` Neil Horman
2015-03-02  8:18       ` Raz Amir
2015-03-02 11:36         ` Neil Horman
2015-03-02 11:58           ` Raz Amir
2015-03-02 13:29             ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-03-03 11:30               ` Raz Amir
2015-03-03 11:45                 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-03-03 12:56                   ` Raz Amir
2015-03-03 13:32 ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2015-03-04  9:07   ` Raz Amir
2015-03-04 10:13     ` Bruce Richardson
2015-03-04 10:28       ` Raz Amir
2015-03-04 11:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Raz Amir
2015-03-09  8:07   ` Raz Amir
2015-03-09 10:27     ` Bruce Richardson
2015-03-10  8:15       ` Raz Amir
2015-03-04 11:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Raz Amir
2015-03-05 14:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Raz Amir
2015-03-05 16:24 ` Raz Amir
2015-03-11 10:26   ` Bruce Richardson
2015-03-12 12:24     ` Raz Amir
2015-03-16 16:29       ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-07-08 22:51         ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150303133246.GB11084@bricha3-MOBL3 \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=razamir22@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).