From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ixgbe: fix compilation issue when RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_RX_ALLOW_BULK_ALLOC is disabled
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 08:31:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150319083158.7c96f645@urahara> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426767878-25468-1-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 12:24:38 +0000
Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> wrote:
> If RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_RX_ALLOW_BULK_ALLOC is disabled in the config file,
> RTE_PMD_IXGBE_RX_MAX_BURST macro and ixgbe_recv_pkts_bulk_alloc function are not declared,
> and some parts of the ixgbe code were still trying to use them.
>
> This patch fixes the problem by including previous conditionals
> that were removed in 01fa1d6 ("ixgbe: unify Rx setup").
>
> Signed-off-by: Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c | 15 ++++++++++++---
> 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> index 8bede22..011e97c 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_pmd_ixgbe/ixgbe_rxtx.c
> @@ -2075,7 +2075,7 @@ check_rx_burst_bulk_alloc_preconditions(__rte_unused struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq)
>
> /* Reset dynamic ixgbe_rx_queue fields back to defaults */
> static void
> -ixgbe_reset_rx_queue(struct ixgbe_hw *hw, struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq)
> +ixgbe_reset_rx_queue(struct ixgbe_hw *hw __rte_unused, struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq)
> {
> static const union ixgbe_adv_rx_desc zeroed_desc = { .read = {
> .pkt_addr = 0}};
> @@ -2092,9 +2092,11 @@ ixgbe_reset_rx_queue(struct ixgbe_hw *hw, struct ixgbe_rx_queue *rxq)
> * constraints here to see if we need to zero out memory after the end
> * of the H/W descriptor ring.
> */
> +#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_RX_ALLOW_BULK_ALLOC
> if (hw->rx_bulk_alloc_allowed)
> /* zero out extra memory */
> len += RTE_PMD_IXGBE_RX_MAX_BURST;
> +#endif
>
> /*
> * Zero out HW ring memory. Zero out extra memory at the end of
> @@ -2238,8 +2240,10 @@ ixgbe_dev_rx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
> * function does not access an invalid memory region.
> */
> len = nb_desc;
> +#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_RX_ALLOW_BULK_ALLOC
> if (hw->rx_bulk_alloc_allowed)
> len += RTE_PMD_IXGBE_RX_MAX_BURST;
> +#endif
>
> rxq->sw_ring = rte_zmalloc_socket("rxq->sw_ring",
> sizeof(struct ixgbe_rx_entry) * len,
> @@ -3544,14 +3548,19 @@ void ixgbe_set_rx_function(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> "burst size no less than 32.");
>
> dev->rx_pkt_burst = ixgbe_recv_pkts_vec;
> - } else if (hw->rx_bulk_alloc_allowed) {
> +
> + }
> +#ifdef RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_RX_ALLOW_BULK_ALLOC
> + else if (hw->rx_bulk_alloc_allowed) {
> PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "Rx Burst Bulk Alloc Preconditions are "
> "satisfied. Rx Burst Bulk Alloc function "
> "will be used on port=%d.",
> dev->data->port_id);
>
> dev->rx_pkt_burst = ixgbe_recv_pkts_bulk_alloc;
> - } else {
> + }
> +#endif
> + else {
> PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "Rx Burst Bulk Alloc Preconditions are not "
> "satisfied, or Scattered Rx is requested, "
> "or RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_RX_ALLOW_BULK_ALLOC "
This code needs some 'de-ifdef' work. It is hard to maintain as is.
I prefer having one inline function, and getting rid of all the #ifdef's
and just let the compiler eliminate dead code.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-19 15:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-19 12:24 Pablo de Lara
2015-03-19 15:31 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2015-03-20 13:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv2] " Konstantin Ananyev
2015-03-20 14:17 ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2015-03-20 21:34 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150319083158.7c96f645@urahara \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).