From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Received: from mail-pa0-f46.google.com (mail-pa0-f46.google.com
 [209.85.220.46]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1626311A2
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 20:28:03 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by padck2 with SMTP id ck2so9630985pad.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to
 :references:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
 bh=8MaTuirQrG2ayZcebZdVXD9z1mvbB6+5Kbkg+aEx2Do=;
 b=M1iVQLfTEYImNtZPI+Fcm0/zFRLIACBa7qSyPpxIChyn1sYIIl8vyXTJ7UYCw4MJ5i
 ddbIc/GSi4M6H9Tat1XuMVKif04M6MEc/D6PQ5prfbUPb+orSiwTNOEEFSnbYh8SMKjW
 phlqgn0GaWs2by++R9MtRScECFSAPMgYeU3lstqNkHImCdS1+FEWoX6IgfMfQ21NT9ZQ
 kMfoHyHh9omW/eQaYafTLRqgGVZysMn4pvQBxEztFQ8SF9JSfPWj9uJhGVFVRgbpTr4u
 Aa2dYXYtJ0qGhUIM85Q5lpvt29AUreYVy9khxvTzBjGRHUK2GUzCjpjGm/YH+jXX2010
 bkvg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn+j3H3SM9koTv3zGoh232gRmtqEytxkb9txRgbizr6XWBCG3lQ87FLLYZQn05P3GBVe83i
X-Received: by 10.68.65.16 with SMTP id t16mr82259007pbs.47.1436898482441;
 Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from urahara (static-50-53-82-155.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net.
 [50.53.82.155])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id da2sm2070661pbb.57.2015.07.14.11.28.01
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 11:28:10 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
Message-ID: <20150714112810.1319eddd@urahara>
In-Reply-To: <1436879459-18400-5-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
References: <PATCH>
 <1436879459-18400-1-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
 <1436879459-18400-5-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/5] virtio: free queue memory in
	virtio_dev_close()
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2015 18:28:03 -0000

On Tue, 14 Jul 2015 14:10:58 +0100
Bernard Iremonger <bernard.iremonger@intel.com> wrote:

>  static void
> +virtio_free_queues(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
> +{
> +	unsigned int i;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_rx_queues; i++) {
> +		virtio_dev_rx_queue_release(dev->data->rx_queues[i]);
> +		dev->data->rx_queues[i] = NULL;
> +	}
> +	dev->data->nb_rx_queues = 0;
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < dev->data->nb_tx_queues; i++) {
> +		virtio_dev_tx_queue_release(dev->data->tx_queues[i]);
> +		dev->data->tx_queues[i] = NULL;
> +	}
> +	dev->data->nb_tx_queues = 0;
> +}
> +

Where does command queue get freed?