From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7467512A8 for ; Sun, 27 Sep 2015 02:14:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Sep 2015 17:14:25 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,594,1437462000"; d="scan'208";a="569093355" Received: from yliu-dev.sh.intel.com (HELO yliu-dev) ([10.239.66.60]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Sep 2015 17:14:24 -0700 Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 08:17:17 +0800 From: Yuanhan Liu To: Thomas Monjalon Message-ID: <20150927001717.GE2326@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> References: <1441776876-14595-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> <20150924140100.GD2326@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> <1848599.sSxKKo3m0q@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1848599.sSxKKo3m0q@xps13> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4 v2] vhost: fix wrong usage of eventfd_t X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2015 00:14:27 -0000 On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 02:44:11PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-09-24 22:01, Yuanhan Liu: > > Would you consider to apply these 4 patches please? The 4th patch > > affects quite many lines of code, and the sooner we apply it, the > > fewer chance it will introduce conflicts for later patches. > > Yes, I'm checking it. > > The patch 4/4 is v2. Other ones have no version. Which means no changes for others in this version. > When you'll send a new version of a new patchset, please > - increment version number of every patches to the same number And, I can do that. > - make the first email the child of the previous version I'm wondering how could you do that, with git-send-email. --yliu