From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41CD35A84
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu,  8 Oct 2015 08:26:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21])
 by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Oct 2015 23:26:12 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,653,1437462000"; d="scan'208";a="821916882"
Received: from yliu-dev.sh.intel.com (HELO yliu-dev) ([10.239.66.49])
 by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 07 Oct 2015 23:26:10 -0700
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 14:29:56 +0800
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Message-ID: <20151008062956.GD3115@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
References: <1441776876-14595-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
 <1848599.sSxKKo3m0q@xps13>
 <20150927001717.GE2326@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
 <1819196.IhieQvLMLL@xps13>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1819196.IhieQvLMLL@xps13>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4 v2] vhost: fix wrong usage of eventfd_t
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 06:26:12 -0000

On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 09:35:35PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-09-27 08:17, Yuanhan Liu:
> > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 02:44:11PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > - make the first email the child of the previous version
> > 
> > I'm wondering how could you do that, with git-send-email.
> 
> It can be checked in http://dpdk.org/dev#send:
> 	--in-reply-to <Message-ID of the previous patch>

Thanks for the tip (and sorry for the late reply).

I see that it might be helpful, especially when it's a single patch or
small patch set. But I doubt it's helpful if it's a large patch set,
and especially when there are quite many comments. Linking a large
thread to another huge thread will make it messy, making it harder for
review, IMO. Or, am I wrong?

	--yliu
> 
> The message id is in the mail headers.