From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp.tuxdriver.com (charlotte.tuxdriver.com [70.61.120.58]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 239CF5A84 for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 16:25:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hmsreliant.think-freely.org ([2001:470:8:a08:7aac:c0ff:fec2:933b] helo=localhost) by smtp.tuxdriver.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Zn5wR-0007BI-L9; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:25:08 -0400 Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 10:25:01 -0400 From: Neil Horman To: Thomas Monjalon Message-ID: <20151016142501.GA5602@hmsreliant.think-freely.org> References: <20151015144406.1aaca698@xeon-e3> <3345500.oDnpnKKuHc@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3345500.oDnpnKKuHc@xps13> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-Spam-Status: No Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK patch backlog X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 14:25:11 -0000 On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:45:23AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-10-15 14:44, Stephen Hemminger: > > There are currently 428 patches in New state in DPDK patchwork. > > > > Thomas, could you start reducing that backlog? > > Yes > > > The simplest solution would be to merge some of the big patch series > > from Intel for the base drivers, then reviewers can focus on the other > > patches. > > That's why having a drivers/net subtree would be useful. > Agreed, a dpdk-next tree would really be the solution here. Neil