DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: "Xie, Huawei" <huawei.xie@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"changchun.ouyang@intel.com" <changchun.ouyang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/5] virtio: clean up space checks on xmit
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:48:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151019084835.7bbeb2c3@xeon-e3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B4B12B838@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>

On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 08:02:07 +0000
"Xie, Huawei" <huawei.xie@intel.com> wrote:

> On 10/19/2015 1:16 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > The space check for transmit ring only needs a single conditional.
> > I.e only need to recheck for space if there was no space in first check.
> I see you reorganized the code. It is more clear and readable with your
> change, but no check is removed.
> We could remove the check after virtio_xmit_cleanup. In current
> implementation, we assume the virtio_xmit_cleanup and vq_ring_free_chain
> always succeed.

The only case that matters is if virtio_xmit_cleanup can not
free up any slots.

> > This can help performance and simplifies loop.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++------------------------
> >  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
> > index c5b53bb..5b50ed0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_rxtx.c
> > @@ -745,7 +745,6 @@ uint16_t
> >  virtio_xmit_pkts(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts)
> >  {
> >  	struct virtqueue *txvq = tx_queue;
> > -	struct rte_mbuf *txm;
> >  	uint16_t nb_used, nb_tx;
> >  	int error;
> >  
> > @@ -759,57 +758,46 @@ virtio_xmit_pkts(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts)
> >  	if (likely(nb_used > txvq->vq_nentries - txvq->vq_free_thresh))
> >  		virtio_xmit_cleanup(txvq, nb_used);
> >  
> > -	nb_tx = 0;
> > +	for (nb_tx = 0; nb_tx < nb_pkts; nb_tx++) {
> > +		struct rte_mbuf *txm = tx_pkts[nb_tx];
> > +		int need = txm->nb_segs - txvq->vq_free_cnt + 1;
> >  
> > -	while (nb_tx < nb_pkts) {
> > -		/* Need one more descriptor for virtio header. */
> > -		int need = tx_pkts[nb_tx]->nb_segs - txvq->vq_free_cnt + 1;
> > -
> > -		/*Positive value indicates it need free vring descriptors */
> > +		/* Positive value indicates it need free vring descriptors */
> As you fix the comment, if it is correct, could you do s/need/needs/ as
> well, :)?
> >  		if (unlikely(need > 0)) {
> >  			nb_used = VIRTQUEUE_NUSED(txvq);
> >  			virtio_rmb();
> >  			need = RTE_MIN(need, (int)nb_used);
> >  
> >  			virtio_xmit_cleanup(txvq, need);
> > -			need = (int)tx_pkts[nb_tx]->nb_segs -
> > -				txvq->vq_free_cnt + 1;
> > -		}
> > -
> > -		/*
> > -		 * Zero or negative value indicates it has enough free
> > -		 * descriptors to use for transmitting.
> > -		 */
> > -		if (likely(need <= 0)) {
> > -			txm = tx_pkts[nb_tx];
> > -
> > -			/* Do VLAN tag insertion */
> > -			if (unlikely(txm->ol_flags & PKT_TX_VLAN_PKT)) {
> > -				error = rte_vlan_insert(&txm);
> > -				if (unlikely(error)) {
> > -					rte_pktmbuf_free(txm);
> > -					++nb_tx;
> > -					continue;
> > -				}
> Still need is rechecked here. It could be removed if virtio_xmit_cleanup
> ensures need would be <= 0 after the call.
> > +			need = txm->nb_segs - txvq->vq_free_cnt + 1;
> > +			if (unlikely(need > 0)) {
> > +				PMD_TX_LOG(ERR,
> > +					   "No free tx descriptors to transmit");
> > +				break;
> >  			}
> > +		}
> >  
> > -			/* Enqueue Packet buffers */
> > -			error = virtqueue_enqueue_xmit(txvq, txm);
> > +		/* Do VLAN tag insertion */
> > +		if (unlikely(txm->ol_flags & PKT_TX_VLAN_PKT)) {
> > +			error = rte_vlan_insert(&txm);
> >  			if (unlikely(error)) {
> > -				if (error == ENOSPC)
> > -					PMD_TX_LOG(ERR, "virtqueue_enqueue Free count = 0");
> > -				else if (error == EMSGSIZE)
> > -					PMD_TX_LOG(ERR, "virtqueue_enqueue Free count < 1");
> > -				else
> > -					PMD_TX_LOG(ERR, "virtqueue_enqueue error: %d", error);
> > -				break;
> > +				rte_pktmbuf_free(txm);
> > +				continue;
> >  			}
> > -			nb_tx++;
> > -			txvq->bytes += txm->pkt_len;
> > -		} else {
> > -			PMD_TX_LOG(ERR, "No free tx descriptors to transmit");
> > +		}
> > +
> > +		/* Enqueue Packet buffers */
> > +		error = virtqueue_enqueue_xmit(txvq, txm);
> > +		if (unlikely(error)) {
> > +			if (error == ENOSPC)
> > +				PMD_TX_LOG(ERR, "virtqueue_enqueue Free count = 0");
> > +			else if (error == EMSGSIZE)
> > +				PMD_TX_LOG(ERR, "virtqueue_enqueue Free count < 1");
> > +			else
> > +				PMD_TX_LOG(ERR, "virtqueue_enqueue error: %d", error);
> >  			break;
> >  		}
> > +		txvq->bytes += txm->pkt_len;
> >  	}
> >  
> >  	txvq->packets += nb_tx;
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-19 15:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-19  5:16 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] virtio: Tx performance improvements Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-19  5:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/5] virtio: clean up space checks on xmit Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-19  8:02   ` Xie, Huawei
2015-10-19 15:48     ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2015-10-19 16:27       ` Xie, Huawei
2015-10-19  5:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/5] virtio: don't use unlikely for normal tx stuff Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-19  5:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/5] virtio: use indirect ring elements Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-19 13:19   ` Xie, Huawei
2015-10-19 15:47     ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-19 16:18       ` Xie, Huawei
2015-10-30 18:01   ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-10-19  5:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/5] virtio: use any layout on transmit Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-19 16:28   ` Xie, Huawei
2015-10-19 16:43     ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-19 16:56       ` Xie, Huawei
2015-10-26 23:47         ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-19 17:19     ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-19  5:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/5] virtio: optimize transmit enqueue Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-20  1:48   ` Xie, Huawei
2015-10-21 13:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] virtio: Tx performance improvements Thomas Monjalon
2015-10-22 10:38   ` Xie, Huawei
2015-10-22 12:13     ` Xie, Huawei
2015-10-22 16:04     ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-23  9:00       ` Xie, Huawei
2015-10-26 23:52         ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-27  1:56           ` Xie, Huawei
2015-10-27  2:23             ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-27  2:38               ` Xie, Huawei
2015-10-26 14:05 ` Xie, Huawei
2016-01-05  8:10   ` Xie, Huawei
2016-01-06 12:03     ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-01-14 13:49       ` Xie, Huawei
2016-03-04  6:18         ` Xie, Huawei
2016-03-04 18:17           ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-03-08  1:38             ` Xie, Huawei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151019084835.7bbeb2c3@xeon-e3 \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=changchun.ouyang@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=huawei.xie@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).