From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 101EBC166
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 16:58:56 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29])
 by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Oct 2015 07:58:55 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,712,1437462000"; d="scan'208";a="585371539"
Received: from yliu-dev.sh.intel.com (HELO yliu-dev) ([10.239.66.49])
 by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Oct 2015 07:58:54 -0700
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 22:59:14 +0800
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20151021145914.GP3115@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
References: <1445399294-18826-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
 <1445399294-18826-5-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
 <20151021133043-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
 <20151021124815.GG3115@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
 <20151021172336-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20151021172336-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, marcel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 4/8] vhost: rxtx: use queue id instead of
 constant ring index
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 14:58:57 -0000

On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 05:26:18PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 08:48:15PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > > Please note that for virtio devices, guest is supposed to
> > > control the placement of incoming packets in RX queues.
> > 
> > I may not follow you.
> > 
> > Enqueuing packets to a RX queue is done at vhost lib, outside the
> > guest, how could the guest take the control here?
> > 
> > 	--yliu
> 
> vhost should do what guest told it to.
> 
> See virtio spec:
> 	5.1.6.5.5 Automatic receive steering in multiqueue mode


Thanks for the info. I'll have a look tomorrow.

	--yliu