From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.mhcomputing.net (master.mhcomputing.net [74.208.46.186]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF9FC46C for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 19:42:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail.mhcomputing.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A9BF380BDAB; Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:41:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 10:41:13 -0700 From: Matthew Hall To: Thomas Monjalon Message-ID: <20151021174113.GA25072@mhcomputing.net> References: <20151015144406.1aaca698@xeon-e3> <2717598.bIV87FGGpb@xps13> <5627514D.1010103@redhat.com> <2265365.ZSeGOJNMlR@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2265365.ZSeGOJNMlR@xps13> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK patch backlog X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2015 17:42:53 -0000 On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 11:03:41AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Compilation must be tested with GCC and clang, as static and shared libraries > and for 32-bit and 64-bit targets. Is this process scripted somewhere? Matthew.