DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Jijiang Liu <jijiang.liu@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] lib/lpm:fix an initialization issue of valid_group in the delete_depth_small()
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:24:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151030142425.GC10520@bricha3-MOBL3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151030142227.GB10520@bricha3-MOBL3>

On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 02:22:27PM +0000, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 09:14:39PM +0800, Jijiang Liu wrote:
> 
> Title can be shortened to: "lpm: fix initialization of valid_group field"
> 
> > Fixes an initialization issue of 'valid_group' in the delete_depth_small function.
> > 
> > In this function, use new rte_lpm_tbl8_entry we call A to replace the old rte_lpm_tbl8_entry. But the valid_group do not set VALID, so it 
> > will be INVALID.
> > 
> > Then when adding a new route which depth is > 24,the tbl8_alloc() function will search the rte_lpm_tbl8_entrys to find INVALID 
> > valid_group, and it will return the A to the add_depth_big function, so A's data is overridden.
> > 
> 
> Not sure this message is entirely clear.
> How about:
>   When adding an entry to a tbl8, the .valid_group field should always be set,
>   so that future adds do not accidently find and use this table, thinking it is
>   currently invalid, i.e. unused, and thereby overwrite existing entries.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: NaNa <nana.nn@alibaba-inc.com>
> > 
Assuming we get a little cleanup on commit title and log message (Thomas, perhaps
just a rewrite on commit?):

Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-30 14:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-30 13:14 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix two issues in lpm Jijiang Liu
2015-10-30 13:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] lib/lpm:fix an issue of condition check in delete_depth_small() Jijiang Liu
2015-10-30 14:13   ` Bruce Richardson
2015-10-30 13:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] lib/lpm:fix an initialization issue of valid_group in the delete_depth_small() Jijiang Liu
2015-10-30 14:22   ` Bruce Richardson
2015-10-30 14:24     ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2015-10-30 14:31       ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-10-30 14:56         ` Richardson, Bruce
2015-11-02  8:05     ` Liu, Jijiang
2015-11-01 18:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix two issues in lpm Thomas Monjalon
2015-11-02  8:09   ` Liu, Jijiang
2015-11-02  8:25     ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-11-02  8:34       ` Liu, Jijiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151030142425.GC10520@bricha3-MOBL3 \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jijiang.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).