From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A058291BF for ; Fri, 30 Oct 2015 15:24:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 30 Oct 2015 07:24:29 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,218,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="823175284" Received: from bricha3-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.237.208.63]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with SMTP; 30 Oct 2015 07:24:26 -0700 Received: by (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:24:25 +0025 Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:24:25 +0000 From: Bruce Richardson To: Jijiang Liu Message-ID: <20151030142425.GC10520@bricha3-MOBL3> References: <1446210879-14242-1-git-send-email-jijiang.liu@intel.com> <1446210879-14242-3-git-send-email-jijiang.liu@intel.com> <20151030142227.GB10520@bricha3-MOBL3> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20151030142227.GB10520@bricha3-MOBL3> Organization: Intel Shannon Ltd. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] lib/lpm:fix an initialization issue of valid_group in the delete_depth_small() X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2015 14:24:30 -0000 On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 02:22:27PM +0000, Bruce Richardson wrote: > On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 09:14:39PM +0800, Jijiang Liu wrote: > > Title can be shortened to: "lpm: fix initialization of valid_group field" > > > Fixes an initialization issue of 'valid_group' in the delete_depth_small function. > > > > In this function, use new rte_lpm_tbl8_entry we call A to replace the old rte_lpm_tbl8_entry. But the valid_group do not set VALID, so it > > will be INVALID. > > > > Then when adding a new route which depth is > 24,the tbl8_alloc() function will search the rte_lpm_tbl8_entrys to find INVALID > > valid_group, and it will return the A to the add_depth_big function, so A's data is overridden. > > > > Not sure this message is entirely clear. > How about: > When adding an entry to a tbl8, the .valid_group field should always be set, > so that future adds do not accidently find and use this table, thinking it is > currently invalid, i.e. unused, and thereby overwrite existing entries. > > > Signed-off-by: NaNa > > Assuming we get a little cleanup on commit title and log message (Thomas, perhaps just a rewrite on commit?): Acked-by: Bruce Richardson