From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 586018E6E for ; Tue, 3 Nov 2015 11:06:52 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 03 Nov 2015 02:06:51 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,238,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="841384532" Received: from bricha3-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.237.208.62]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 03 Nov 2015 02:06:49 -0800 Received: by (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 03 Nov 2015 10:06:48 +0025 Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 10:06:48 +0000 From: Bruce Richardson To: Thomas Monjalon Message-ID: <20151103100647.GA15320@bricha3-MOBL3> References: <1434108496-1993-1-git-send-email-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <1441811374-28984-1-git-send-email-bruce.richardson@intel.com> <20150928102331.GA29488@bricha3-MOBL3> <2267975.4VpYOnsq4s@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2267975.4VpYOnsq4s@xps13> Organization: Intel Shannon Ltd. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/4] ethdev: minor cleanup X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2015 10:06:52 -0000 On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 02:11:24AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > Bruce Richardson (4): > > > ethdev: rename macros to have RTE_ETH prefix > > > ethdev: move error checking macros to header > > > ethdev: remove duplicated debug functions > > > ethdev: check driver support for functions > > > > > > lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.c | 674 ++++++++++++++++++------------------------ > > > lib/librte_ether/rte_ethdev.h | 121 ++++++-- > > > 2 files changed, 375 insertions(+), 420 deletions(-) > > > > > > > Thomas, all, > > > > Any comments on this set? > > Sorry I missed it. > Could you please rebase it on current code? > Thanks Sure. Will do.