From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Pradeep Kathail <pkathail@cisco.com>
Cc: "CHIOSI, MARGARET T" <mc3124@att.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Proposals from project governance meeting at DPDK Userspace (was Notes from ...)
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 15:35:30 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151103153530.296cc8f6@xeon-e3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5637EEC0.2020103@cisco.com>
On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 15:16:16 -0800
Pradeep Kathail <pkathail@cisco.com> wrote:
> Tim and Dave,
>
> I agree that an architecture board membership should be based on
> technical standing and contribution but at the same time,
> if you are trying to bring a new hardware paradigm into a project, you
> need to give a chance to some of those experts to
> participate and gain the standing.
>
> If community is serious about supporting SOC's, my suggestion will be
> to allow few (2?) members from SOC community for
> limited time (6? months) and then evaluate based on their contributions.
>
> Pradeep
Why doesn't one or more SOC vendors contribute patches or discuss
the issues on the mailing list or at DPDK meetings. I dont think we
need a behind closed doors planning session on this. Much prefer
the old "consensus and running code model".
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-03 23:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-30 18:01 Bagh Fares
2015-11-02 16:04 ` CHIOSI, MARGARET T
2015-11-02 17:21 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-11-02 17:28 ` CHIOSI, MARGARET T
2015-11-02 17:31 ` Dave Neary
2015-11-02 17:44 ` Bagh Fares
2015-11-02 17:55 ` Dave Neary
2015-11-02 18:02 ` Bagh Fares
2015-11-02 21:44 ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2015-11-02 23:16 ` Pradeep Kathail
2015-11-03 12:43 ` O'Driscoll, Tim
2015-11-03 13:03 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-11-03 22:05 ` Bagh Fares
2015-11-03 22:47 ` Vincent JARDIN
2015-11-03 15:17 ` CHIOSI, MARGARET T
2015-11-03 23:35 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2015-11-04 17:02 ` Pradeep Kathail
2015-11-02 18:01 ` Thomas Monjalon
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-10-11 0:36 [dpdk-dev] Notes from project governance meeting at DPDK Userspace Dave Neary
2015-10-12 16:45 ` [dpdk-dev] Proposals from project governance meeting at DPDK Userspace (was Notes from ...) Dave Neary
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151103153530.296cc8f6@xeon-e3 \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=mc3124@att.com \
--cc=pkathail@cisco.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).