From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <mhall@mhcomputing.net>
Received: from mail.mhcomputing.net (master.mhcomputing.net [74.208.228.170])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECE9E8DA9
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 20:01:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail.mhcomputing.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
 id 7146C400; Wed, 11 Nov 2015 14:01:21 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 14:01:21 -0500
From: Matthew Hall <mhall@mhcomputing.net>
To: "Montorsi, Francesco" <fmontorsi@empirix.com>
Message-ID: <20151111190121.GB18270@mhcomputing.net>
References: <964049bfb9054699a2e4520c6758a7ee@bilemail1.empirix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <964049bfb9054699a2e4520c6758a7ee@bilemail1.empirix.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Permanently binding NIC ports with DPDK drivers
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2015 19:01:22 -0000

In my development environment I set up an at-boot provisioning script that 
does it. I recommend using scripts and not shelling out from C code. ;)

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 04:13:01PM +0000, Montorsi, Francesco wrote:
> Hi,
> Is there a way to permanently (i.e., have the configuration automatically applied after reboot) bind a NIC port to DPDK?
> 
> In case there's none, I'm thinking to save in my software a list of the NIC ports chosen by the user for use with DPDK and then, upon software startup to just do
>     for (int i=0; i < ...; i++)
>      system("dpdk_nic_bind.py --bind=igb_uio " + PCI_device_chosen[i]);
> Do you see any problem with that? 
> 
> Thanks!
> Francesco Montorsi
>