From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEDCC568A
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu,  3 Dec 2015 02:46:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27])
 by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Dec 2015 17:46:05 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,375,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="699176942"
Received: from yliu-dev.sh.intel.com (HELO yliu-dev) ([10.239.66.49])
 by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Dec 2015 17:46:04 -0800
Date: Thu, 3 Dec 2015 09:49:37 +0800
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Message-ID: <20151203014937.GW2325@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
References: <1449027793-30975-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
 <565EF7E9.6080400@redhat.com>
 <20151202143101.GR2325@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
 <5175915.33XpI3YTlb@xps13>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5175915.33XpI3YTlb@xps13>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Victor Kaplansky <vkaplans@redhat.com>,
 "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] vhost: handle VHOST_USER_SET_LOG_BASE
 request
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2015 01:46:07 -0000

On Wed, Dec 02, 2015 at 05:38:10PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2015-12-02 22:31, Yuanhan Liu:
> > Thomas, should I write an ABI deprecation note? Can I make it for
> > v2.2 release If I make one tomorrow? (Sorry that I'm not awared
> > of that it would be an ABI break).
> 
> As Panu suggested, it would be better to reserve some room now
> in 2.2 which already breaks vhost ABI.
> Maybe we have a chance to keep the same vhost ABI in 2.3.


Got it. I will cook up one now.

	--yliu
> 
> The 2.2 release will probably be closed in less than 2 weeks.