From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB958D93
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 07:13:41 +0100 (CET)
Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48])
 by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Jan 2016 22:13:41 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.20,556,1444719600"; d="scan'208";a="27788823"
Received: from yliu-dev.sh.intel.com (HELO yliu-dev) ([10.239.66.49])
 by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 11 Jan 2016 22:13:38 -0800
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 14:14:34 +0800
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: Tetsuya Mukawa <mukawa@igel.co.jp>,
 Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>,
 "Xie, Huawei" <huawei.xie@intel.com>, "Xu, Qian Q" <qian.q.xu@intel.com>
Message-ID: <20160112061434.GL26062@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
References: <1446748276-132087-1-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
 <1452426182-86851-1-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
 <569490D9.10803@igel.co.jp> <5694934B.5070900@intel.com>
 <5694969D.3040008@igel.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5694969D.3040008@igel.co.jp>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Cc: nakajima.yoshihiro@lab.ntt.co.jp, mst@redhat.com, dev@dpdk.org,
 ann.zhuangyanying@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] virtio support for container
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 06:13:41 -0000

On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 03:01:01PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote:
> On 2016/01/12 14:46, Tan, Jianfeng wrote:
> >
> > Hi Tetsuya,
> >  
> >
> >> Hi Jianfeng and Xie,
> >>
> >> I guess my implementation and yours have a lot of common code, so I will
> >> try to rebase my patch on yours.
> >
> > We also think so. And before you rebase your code, I think we can rely
> > on Yuanhan's
> > struct virtio_pci_ops to make the code structure brief and clear, as
> > discussed in your
> > patch's thread, i.e., we both rebase our code according to Yuanhan's
> > code. Is that OK?
> >
> 
> Yes, I agree with it.

I will send v2 out today, and hopefully someone will ACK and test it
soon.  After that, I'm also hoping Thomas could do a quick merge then.

	--yliu