From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A0BAC5E8 for ; Fri, 29 Jan 2016 10:16:15 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Jan 2016 01:16:14 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,363,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="871555442" Received: from yliu-dev.sh.intel.com (HELO yliu-dev) ([10.239.66.49]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 29 Jan 2016 01:16:12 -0800 Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 17:17:01 +0800 From: Yuanhan Liu To: Tetsuya Mukawa Message-ID: <20160129091701.GY4257@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> References: <1453108389-21006-2-git-send-email-mukawa@igel.co.jp> <1453973612-8599-4-git-send-email-mukawa@igel.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1453973612-8599-4-git-send-email-mukawa@igel.co.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] virtio: Add a new layer to abstract pci access method X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 09:16:15 -0000 On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 06:33:32PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote: > This patch addss function pointers to abstract pci access method. > This abstraction layer will be used when virtio-net PMD supports > container extension. > > The below functions abstract how to access to pci configuration space. > > struct virtio_pci_cfg_ops { > int (*map)(...); > void (*unmap)(...); > void *(*get_mapped_addr)(...); > int (*read)(...); > }; > > The pci configuration space has information how to access to virtio > device registers. Basically, there are 2 ways to acccess to the > registers. One is using portio and the other is using mapped memory. > The below functions abstract this access method. One question: is there a way to map PCI memory with Qtest? I'm thinking if we can keep the io_read/write() for Qtest as well, if so, code could be simplified, a lot, IMO. --yliu