From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D54137A6 for ; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 16:19:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Feb 2016 07:19:41 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,426,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="881289302" Received: from bricha3-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.237.208.159]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 10 Feb 2016 07:19:39 -0800 Received: by (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 10 Feb 2016 15:19:39 +0025 Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 15:19:39 +0000 From: Bruce Richardson To: "Ananyev, Konstantin" , stephen@networkplumber.org Message-ID: <20160210151938.GB10908@bricha3-MOBL3> References: <1447431013-23245-1-git-send-email-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20151211084819.2177795d@xeon-e3> <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725836AD2DA5@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725836AD2DA5@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> Organization: Intel Shannon Ltd. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 ] ixgbe: speed up transmit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 15:19:43 -0000 On Fri, Dec 11, 2015 at 06:52:36PM +0000, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:shemming at brocade.com] > > Sent: Friday, December 11, 2015 4:48 PM > > To: dev at dpdk.org; Zhang, Helin; Ananyev, Konstantin > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 ] ixgbe: speed up transmit > > > > On Fri, 13 Nov 2015 08:10:13 -0800 > > Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > > > From: Stephen Hemminger > > > > > > The freeing of mbuf's in ixgbe is one of the observable hot spots > > > under load. Optimize it by doing bulk free of mbufs using code similar > > > to i40e and fm10k. > > > > > > Drop the no longer needed micro-optimization for the no refcount flag. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger > > > > How come this patch got no review or comments? > > It gets a visible performance gain of up to 10% in some cases. > > > > I understand maintainers are busy with internal work, but they need > > to read mailing list as well. > > Yep, I missed it somehow. > BTW, by some reason I couldn't find it patchwork.... > Was it submitted too late for 2.2 timeframe? > Anyway, about the patch itself: it looks good to me and indeed it provides 10%+ > performance improvement. > So here is my ACK for it. > Konstantin Applied to dpdk-next-net/rel_16_04, with edited title to clarify that it's the non-vectorized tx code that is being sped up, and not all ixgbe transmit paths. Thanks, /Bruce