From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.mhcomputing.net (master.mhcomputing.net [74.208.228.170]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 072A011D9 for ; Thu, 11 Feb 2016 04:41:20 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail.mhcomputing.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 81C1214C; Wed, 10 Feb 2016 19:41:19 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 19:41:19 -0800 From: Matthew Hall To: Seth Arnold Message-ID: <20160211034119.GA10314@mhcomputing.net> References: <20160211030540.GB25680@hunt> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160211030540.GB25680@hunt> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] thoughts on DPDK after a few days of reading sources X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 03:41:20 -0000 On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 07:05:40PM -0800, Seth Arnold wrote: > - ixgbe driver in the package is very different from the driver in the > Linux kernel -- when bugs in one are found, who is in charge of copying > the fixes between the two code bases? It's not the Linux driver. It's from BSD because DPDK uses mbufs. The MAINTAINERS file / Intel team refreshes it w/ shared code from their upstream BSD support. Matthew.