From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga11.intel.com (mga11.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C3452C0B for ; Mon, 22 Feb 2016 15:23:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from fmsmga003.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.29]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Feb 2016 06:23:04 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,484,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="657152674" Received: from yliu-dev.sh.intel.com (HELO yliu-dev) ([10.239.66.49]) by FMSMGA003.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 22 Feb 2016 06:23:03 -0800 Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 22:24:16 +0800 From: Yuanhan Liu To: Thomas Monjalon Message-ID: <20160222142416.GZ21426@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> References: <1450321921-27799-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com> <2602035.hWpncUurjs@xps13> <20160222070824.GY21426@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> <1606367.cIK8dmaxrY@xps13> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1606367.cIK8dmaxrY@xps13> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Victor Kaplansky , "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/8] vhost-user live migration support X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2016 14:23:08 -0000 On Mon, Feb 22, 2016 at 10:56:42AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > Patches 2 and 3 have been merged to avoid a compilation error. > > > Applied, thanks > > > > Actually, there was a ongoing discussion about patch 6, the handling > > of VHOST_USER_SEND_RARP request: > > > > http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2016-February/033539.html > > > > Maybe you have seen that and I didn't make it clear; my bad. Since you > > have already applied it. I will make a standalone patch, and try to > > send it out today. > > Yes I've wrongly understood there was no problem. > The series would have not been applied if you had said that a new version > was needed or if you had set the patchwork status to "Changes Requested". Yeah, that's my bad. I meant to send it out soon, say, last Friday night. However, I didn't make it. For the patchwork stuff, I'm still gettig used to it. So, thanks for the tip. I will bear that in mind next time. > Sorry, we'll do better next times ;) Yeah :) A new patch will be sent out soon. Please consider to apply it. Or, maybe we can hold it for a while, to see if someone else have comments. I will ping you to apply it next week if no comments. Thanks. --yliu