From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6E635A08 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 2016 17:35:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 26 Feb 2016 08:35:45 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,498,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="921831538" Received: from bricha3-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.237.208.63]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 26 Feb 2016 08:35:43 -0800 Received: by (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 26 Feb 2016 16:35:42 +0025 Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 16:35:42 +0000 From: Bruce Richardson To: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: <20160226163542.GB28808@bricha3-MOBL3> References: <1455794803-20383-1-git-send-email-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <1456500415-27416-1-git-send-email-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <1456500415-27416-3-git-send-email-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1456500415-27416-3-git-send-email-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> Organization: Intel Shannon Ltd. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Cc: dev@dpdk.org, =?iso-8859-1?Q?Nicol=E1s?= Pernas Maradei Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] ring: rename fields in internal data struct X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2016 16:35:47 -0000 On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 03:26:54PM +0000, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > Rename nb_rx/tx_queues fields in internals struct to max_rx/tx_queues > > This patch just does variable renaming to help understanding code better, > nothing changed in functionality of the code. > > Updated fields required to keep max queue numbers configured. For current > queue number requirements data->nb_rx/tx_queues fields used. > There are other changes in this patchset other than renaming the rx/tx queue fields. They should be called out in the commit message, I think. The whitespace cleanup change should probably be omitted from this patch as not related to renaming. /Bruce