From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Received: from mga04.intel.com (mga04.intel.com [192.55.52.120])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F3752C50
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue,  8 Mar 2016 13:24:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26])
 by fmsmga104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Mar 2016 04:24:49 -0800
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,556,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="932124462"
Received: from yliu-dev.sh.intel.com (HELO yliu-dev) ([10.239.66.49])
 by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 08 Mar 2016 04:24:48 -0800
Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2016 20:27:11 +0800
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: "Xie, Huawei" <huawei.xie@intel.com>
Message-ID: <20160308122711.GR14300@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
References: <1449122773-25510-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
 <1455803352-5518-1-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
 <1455803352-5518-3-git-send-email-yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
 <C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B4C6373DF@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <C37D651A908B024F974696C65296B57B4C6373DF@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
 Victor Kaplansky <vkaplans@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/7] vhost: refactor virtio_dev_rx
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2016 12:24:54 -0000

On Mon, Mar 07, 2016 at 03:34:53AM +0000, Xie, Huawei wrote:
> On 2/18/2016 9:48 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > +	while (1) {
> > +		/* done with current mbuf, fetch next */
> > +		if (mbuf_avail == 0) {
> > +			m = m->next;
> > +			if (m == NULL)
> > +				break;
> > +
> > +			mbuf_offset = 0;
> > +			mbuf_avail  = rte_pktmbuf_data_len(m);
> > +		}
> > +
> 
> You could use while (mbuf_avail || m->next) to align with the style of
> coyp_desc_to_mbuf?

Good suggestion, will do that.

Thanks.

	--yliu