From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Helin Zhang <helin.zhang@intel.com>,
Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK and HW offloads
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:16:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160318101611.2df26ef6@xeon-e3> (raw)
As I look at how the ethernet device interface in DPDK has exploded in complexity;
it makes life very hard for end users. The goal has been to enable all the cool hardware
features, but it has put blinders on the driver devlopers; they are ignoring the fact
that real applications can't just work on one kind of hardware.
The DPDK is doing a terrible job at providing abstractions. There needs to be a
real generic set of operations, and every hardware offload feature must:
* have a clear well defined API
* if feature is not available in software, then the DPDK must provide
a software equivalent feature.
* any difference in API must be hidden from application.
* no compile config options about offload.
* tests and documentation must work for both hw and sw version
Right now, all those offload features are pretty much unusable in a real product
without lots and lots of extra codes and huge bug surface. It bothers me enough
that I would recommend removing much of the filter/offload/ptype stuff from DPDK!
next reply other threads:[~2016-03-18 17:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-18 17:16 Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2016-03-18 18:00 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-20 14:17 ` Zhang, Helin
2016-03-20 19:18 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-21 14:52 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-03-21 15:26 ` Kyle Larose
2016-03-22 5:50 ` Qiu, Michael
2016-03-22 10:19 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-03-22 12:19 ` Jay Rolette
2016-03-22 17:17 ` Stephen Hemminger
2016-03-22 17:41 ` Jerin Jacob
2016-03-23 2:47 ` Qiu, Michael
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160318101611.2df26ef6@xeon-e3 \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=helin.zhang@intel.com \
--cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).