From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga02.intel.com (mga02.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC45E2C06 for ; Fri, 18 Mar 2016 15:13:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Mar 2016 07:13:09 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,355,1455004800"; d="scan'208";a="913940788" Received: from bricha3-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com ([10.237.221.44]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with SMTP; 18 Mar 2016 07:13:07 -0700 Received: by (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:13:06 +0025 Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:13:06 +0000 From: Bruce Richardson To: Tetsuya Mukawa Cc: Thomas Monjalon , dev@dpdk.org, Zhuangyanying Message-ID: <20160318141306.GB12932@bricha3-MOBL3> References: <1457316434-19128-3-git-send-email-mukawa@igel.co.jp> <20160318122702.GA12932@bricha3-MOBL3> <2019937.rZsZyTZeYO@xps13> <56EC0ACC.6040806@igel.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <56EC0ACC.6040806@igel.co.jp> Organization: Intel Shannon Ltd. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v12 2/2] vhost: Add VHOST PMD X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 14:13:11 -0000 On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 11:03:56PM +0900, Tetsuya Mukawa wrote: > On 2016/03/18 22:52, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 2016-03-18 22:41, Tetsuya Mukawa: > >> 2016/03/18 午後9:27 "Bruce Richardson" : > >>> I hope to get this set merged for RC2 very soon. Can you provide an > >>> update for the nic overview.rst doc listing out the features of > >>> this new PMD. > > [...] > >> I've sent the v12 patch with vhost.rst. > >> Could you please check below? > > Bruce is talking about the table of features in overview.rst. > > Hi Bruce and Thomas, > > Thanks, I've got it. > Now I am out of office, so I will send the patch separately by hopefully > tomorrow. > Could you please apply it separately? > I'll hold applying the patchset until I have all relevant bits ready to go together. If it's in by Monday, it should be ok. Please also supply a more detailed comment for the new flag addition that Thomas has called out on patch 1. That needs to be resolved too before apply. /Bruce