DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Mohan Prasad <kcmohanprasad@gmail.com>
Cc: "Wiles, Keith" <keith.wiles@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK: receive single packet at a time
Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 14:16:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160329131619.GB22104@bricha3-MOBL3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADSKuqsqZSGqgDOb5sQtGZVwxBtCWOthCM5REzhL-YU63ybSNA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 06:31:58PM +0530, Mohan Prasad wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I have tried this and it does not work
> 

What type of NIC are you using. If you are using ixgbe or i40e, try disabling
the vector PMD in your build-time configuration to see if it makes a difference.

However, why do you want to receive just a single packet at a time. Why not just
receive a burst of packets and then process them one at a time? It's much more
efficient that way, and you should get better performance from your application.

/Bruce


> Thanks,
> Mohan
> On Mar 29, 2016 6:26 PM, "Wiles, Keith" <keith.wiles@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >Is there any option to receive single packet at a time with dpdk?
> >
> > Not sure if this is the answer you are looking for, but if you just
> > request a single packet with
> >
> > struct rte_mbuf *mbuf;
> > rte_eth_rx_burst(port_id, queue_id, &mbuf, 1);
> >
> > will return only one packet as a time.
> > >
> > >Thanks,
> > >Mohan
> > >
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Keith
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-03-29 13:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-29 11:32 Mohan Prasad
2016-03-29 12:56 ` Wiles, Keith
2016-03-29 13:01   ` Mohan Prasad
2016-03-29 13:08     ` Wiles, Keith
2016-03-29 13:21       ` Mohan Prasad
2016-03-29 13:16     ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2016-03-30  5:36       ` Mohan Prasad
2016-03-31 11:42         ` Mohan Prasad
2016-03-31 12:40           ` Wiles, Keith
2016-03-31 12:43             ` Wiles, Keith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160329131619.GB22104@bricha3-MOBL3 \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=kcmohanprasad@gmail.com \
    --cc=keith.wiles@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).