From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75B8A3B5
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:55:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27])
 by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Apr 2016 09:55:27 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,513,1455004800"; d="scan'208";a="789498966"
Received: from yliu-dev.sh.intel.com (HELO yliu-dev) ([10.239.67.162])
 by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Apr 2016 09:55:25 -0700
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 09:56:54 -0700
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
Cc: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@samsung.com>, dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
 Daniele Di Proietto <diproiettod@vmware.com>,
 "dev@openvswitch.org" <dev@openvswitch.org>,
 Dyasly Sergey <s.dyasly@samsung.com>
Message-ID: <20160421165654.GB11584@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
References: <CAATJJ0JLd9iqNBvD=kyfpzk5DjGF_pGz+hBNeionZpuctNBymQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <5718B306.5070801@samsung.com>
 <CAATJJ0LgZP_6=0X=WRbSOEueSuu4uCpU1n8bVcuxMwtSsPQ_nw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <CAATJJ0LgZP_6=0X=WRbSOEueSuu4uCpU1n8bVcuxMwtSsPQ_nw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Memory leak when adding/removing vhost_user ports
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 16:55:28 -0000

On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 04:04:03PM +0200, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> Thanks Ilya,
> yeah we usually wait for the point releases as they undergo some extra testing
> and verification.
> .1 shouldn't be too much into the future I guess.
> Thanks a lot for identifying.
> 
> That said, I'd still go on with Yuanhan to finalize the dpdk side leak fix we
> identified, so we eventually get it committed.
> So Yuanhan, what do you think of my last revised version of your patch for
> upstream DPDK (there with the vhost_destroy_device then)?

That's good.

> I mean it is essentially your patch plus a bit of polishing, not mine so I
> don't feel entitled to submit it as mine :-)

Thanks. I will make and send out a formal patch later.

	--yliu