From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-pf0-f172.google.com (mail-pf0-f172.google.com [209.85.192.172]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 508563978 for ; Thu, 5 May 2016 19:12:56 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-pf0-f172.google.com with SMTP id y69so39445938pfb.1 for ; Thu, 05 May 2016 10:12:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=networkplumber-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HyoOMGIEg9Q/ADlhcC+eWSoFwSYNFkX+5NXoJgbQlL0=; b=kit/s8wLMZZuchOwH0au+jfD9yPofkseruSN8c7le/z+LnQLJQfPwLNc4TTYrHCwWf UaPSGKfDedWKRAbifQ0o6DkdC12R839/nNguyGcckzcNqW8+/jTBwCLKQU0g35p1/d7j WqZ+r/uy0RrZuKFGEZtVoV+KiBg8eOl0YEAqBiwLwyi4cQIdOXzfvbnJu31uuOERrnI5 5EENj5TVzMsr3AqTV1TgKPgqcZk9T1ZpdOhOJOPw2ExrsDpD88W6sBVbIZf535uNL+og 5RmC4SXtWbQUZu2Zqzwgpw1DGA4300d0zYqzt/Bjq1QzMdxU2nUebBB6yRXBBw9PzZDM 2Bag== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HyoOMGIEg9Q/ADlhcC+eWSoFwSYNFkX+5NXoJgbQlL0=; b=Ua9dAHf6Yqvi/Y1Kz5s1TIhmmvg3hgjyj7SLvEAeFmWAS71T070WvU4bGZ34iVwRCh Fo1pzXNUg+gMO9D67K9h7oMqoZX+Hria8lWpD/OAKjmNI1W/+tRhqLwUpzZ4bBcY1RH7 AK992jc0JtQp7BmyWigaqx9mN52vPqeXDLwo2xOtM2SmsAlndVjC5CSrzO25ZV6/emVl LbXYPjfW7wItLN0qdZOcs8BE857J31cLgz7Zb2BG9sM0Nj5u4rqcAXqewmteOgBuVel3 fOmFhTccVI3FbykjjLwHkSF51EZq9YYHHWYmUrlXi/01K1v14u11uk0hMRVf/A+ajiOo s56g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FVQlvt4j6LParop0DLJ4+hc0nktULBdodOJQ8Kj/kjQPTPEXU8yBem6M082a8KYFA== X-Received: by 10.98.50.67 with SMTP id y64mr22264858pfy.128.1462468375702; Thu, 05 May 2016 10:12:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xeon-e3 (static-50-53-72-186.bvtn.or.frontiernet.net. [50.53.72.186]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s124sm15019559pfb.63.2016.05.05.10.12.55 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 05 May 2016 10:12:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 5 May 2016 10:12:33 -0700 From: Stephen Hemminger To: Bernard Iremonger Cc: dev@dpdk.org, declan.doherty@intel.com Message-ID: <20160505101233.191151ac@xeon-e3> In-Reply-To: <1462461300-9962-2-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> References: <1462461300-9962-1-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> <1462461300-9962-2-git-send-email-bernard.iremonger@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/5] bonding: replace spinlock with read/write lock X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2016 17:12:56 -0000 On Thu, 5 May 2016 16:14:56 +0100 Bernard Iremonger wrote: > Fixes: a45b288ef21a ("bond: support link status polling") > Signed-off-by: Bernard Iremonger You know an uncontested reader/writer lock is significantly slower than a spinlock.