From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F0823237
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed,  1 Jun 2016 09:35:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from fmsmga004.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.48])
 by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Jun 2016 00:35:24 -0700
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,400,1459839600"; d="scan'208";a="113944884"
Received: from yliu-dev.sh.intel.com (HELO yliu-dev) ([10.239.67.162])
 by fmsmga004.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 01 Jun 2016 00:35:22 -0700
Date: Wed, 1 Jun 2016 15:38:14 +0800
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: Jianfeng Tan <jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Huawei Xie <huawei.xie@intel.com>,
 rich.lane@bigswitch.com, mst@redhat.com,
 nakajima.yoshihiro@lab.ntt.co.jp, p.fedin@samsung.com,
 ann.zhuangyanying@huawei.com, mukawa@igel.co.jp, nhorman@tuxdriver.com
Message-ID: <20160601073814.GD10038@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com>
References: <1446748276-132087-1-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
 <1464605739-140761-1-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
 <1464605739-140761-3-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1464605739-140761-3-git-send-email-jianfeng.tan@intel.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/8] virtio: clean up
	virtio_dev_queue_setup
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2016 07:35:25 -0000

On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 10:55:33AM +0000, Jianfeng Tan wrote:
> Abstract vring hdr desc init as an inline method.

What's this patch for then? In your last version, it will be invoked
twice, but it turned out to be wrong. So, why keeping this change?
I didn't see it improves anything.

	--yliu